"The time has come for the American government to recognize the damage that has occurred to our economy, and to take firm action to curtail what I believe is both unfair and illegal foreign competition"
About this Quote
A politician’s most reliable instrument isn’t a policy paper; it’s a moral frame. Norm Dicks’ line is built to turn economic anxiety into an indictment with a target, and then to present government as the only grown-up in the room. “The time has come” is the classic Washington starter pistol: it implies delay has been tolerated long enough, and anyone still hesitating is out of step with urgency. He isn’t just diagnosing a problem; he’s declaring a threshold moment that authorizes tougher moves.
“Recognize the damage” quietly shifts the debate from prediction to aftermath. Damage has “occurred,” which makes the situation feel measurable, provable, already paid for by workers and communities. That sets up the emotional logic for “firm action,” a phrase that signals strength without specifying the cost. It’s a promise of force, not yet a blueprint.
The most strategic hinge is “what I believe.” Dicks threads a needle between accusation and liability: he puts foreign competition on trial while preserving plausible deniability if the legal case is contested. Then he doubles down with “both unfair and illegal,” pairing a moral verdict (“unfair”) with a juridical one (“illegal”). That combination is rhetorically potent because it invites bipartisan agreement: even free-trade skeptics can rally around fairness; even pro-trade centrists can oppose illegality.
Contextually, this belongs to the recurring American cycle of trade politics, when manufacturing pressure and electoral incentives align. The subtext is constituency protection: identify a villain abroad, affirm injury at home, and license enforcement actions (tariffs, anti-dumping measures, trade remedies) as not protectionism, but justice.
“Recognize the damage” quietly shifts the debate from prediction to aftermath. Damage has “occurred,” which makes the situation feel measurable, provable, already paid for by workers and communities. That sets up the emotional logic for “firm action,” a phrase that signals strength without specifying the cost. It’s a promise of force, not yet a blueprint.
The most strategic hinge is “what I believe.” Dicks threads a needle between accusation and liability: he puts foreign competition on trial while preserving plausible deniability if the legal case is contested. Then he doubles down with “both unfair and illegal,” pairing a moral verdict (“unfair”) with a juridical one (“illegal”). That combination is rhetorically potent because it invites bipartisan agreement: even free-trade skeptics can rally around fairness; even pro-trade centrists can oppose illegality.
Contextually, this belongs to the recurring American cycle of trade politics, when manufacturing pressure and electoral incentives align. The subtext is constituency protection: identify a villain abroad, affirm injury at home, and license enforcement actions (tariffs, anti-dumping measures, trade remedies) as not protectionism, but justice.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|
More Quotes by Norm
Add to List

