"The timing was terrible, and having one disaster after another didn't help. I think the pictures on television of the way in which the disaster was handled also helped to turn off the public and Congress"
About this Quote
Disaster, Tauzin implies, is rarely just an act of nature; it is a referendum on competence. His line reads like a post-mortem from inside the machine: the “timing was terrible” frames failure as bad luck, but the sentence can’t hold that alibi for long. “One disaster after another” admits a compounding effect that politics dreads most - not the first blow, but the sense of an unraveling narrative.
The most revealing phrase is “pictures on television.” Tauzin is pointing to a modern truth politicians often hate to say out loud: governance is mediated, and legitimacy is negotiated through images. Bureaucratic errors might be survivable on paper; they become toxic when converted into broadcast spectacle. The public doesn’t need a policy memo to know what chaos looks like. Congress, tuned to the same footage and the same polling, follows. “Turn off” is blunt, almost consumerist language, as if support is a channel you change when the program gets ugly. That’s not accidental; it’s a recognition that democratic consent is increasingly like audience retention.
His intent is twofold: to explain political momentum (why patience ran out) while subtly shifting responsibility from decision-makers to circumstances and optics. Yet the subtext cuts the other way. If images can “turn off” the public, then the handling wasn’t merely imperfect - it was visibly, unmistakably wrong. In that sense, Tauzin isn’t just describing media influence; he’s confessing how power gets disciplined when failure becomes impossible to edit.
The most revealing phrase is “pictures on television.” Tauzin is pointing to a modern truth politicians often hate to say out loud: governance is mediated, and legitimacy is negotiated through images. Bureaucratic errors might be survivable on paper; they become toxic when converted into broadcast spectacle. The public doesn’t need a policy memo to know what chaos looks like. Congress, tuned to the same footage and the same polling, follows. “Turn off” is blunt, almost consumerist language, as if support is a channel you change when the program gets ugly. That’s not accidental; it’s a recognition that democratic consent is increasingly like audience retention.
His intent is twofold: to explain political momentum (why patience ran out) while subtly shifting responsibility from decision-makers to circumstances and optics. Yet the subtext cuts the other way. If images can “turn off” the public, then the handling wasn’t merely imperfect - it was visibly, unmistakably wrong. In that sense, Tauzin isn’t just describing media influence; he’s confessing how power gets disciplined when failure becomes impossible to edit.
Quote Details
| Topic | Tough Times |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Billy
Add to List


