"The trend of all knowledge at the present is to specialize, but archaeology has in it all the qualities that call for the wide view of the human race, of its growth from the savage to the civilized, which is seen in all stages of social and religious development"
About this Quote
Specialization, Murray warns, can become a kind of intellectual tunnel vision: the more expert we get, the easier it is to forget what the expertise is for. Her praise of archaeology lands as a corrective. It is a science, yes, but one that refuses to stay politely in its lane. You can’t excavate a pot, a grave, a temple foundation without being pulled into big questions about kinship, power, belief, trade, ritual, fear. Archaeology embarrasses narrowness because every shard arrives with a social world attached.
The subtext is a defense of synthesis at a moment when modern research culture was hardening into departments, methods, and professional gatekeeping. Murray isn’t rejecting rigor; she’s arguing that rigor without range produces a sterile kind of knowing. The discipline’s “wide view” becomes a moral and civic argument: if you want to understand people, you have to trace continuities across class, time, and geography, not just perfect technique in a lab.
Her language also gives away the era. “From the savage to the civilized” carries the evolutionary ladder that early 20th-century scholarship often treated as common sense. Today it reads as a warning label: a reminder that the “wide view” can smuggle in hierarchy even while claiming comprehensiveness. That tension is precisely why the quote still works. Murray is both celebrating archaeology’s capacity to tell human stories and revealing how easily those stories become progress narratives. The line doubles as manifesto and self-indictment: a call to see the whole human record, and a prompt to interrogate the frames we use when we do.
The subtext is a defense of synthesis at a moment when modern research culture was hardening into departments, methods, and professional gatekeeping. Murray isn’t rejecting rigor; she’s arguing that rigor without range produces a sterile kind of knowing. The discipline’s “wide view” becomes a moral and civic argument: if you want to understand people, you have to trace continuities across class, time, and geography, not just perfect technique in a lab.
Her language also gives away the era. “From the savage to the civilized” carries the evolutionary ladder that early 20th-century scholarship often treated as common sense. Today it reads as a warning label: a reminder that the “wide view” can smuggle in hierarchy even while claiming comprehensiveness. That tension is precisely why the quote still works. Murray is both celebrating archaeology’s capacity to tell human stories and revealing how easily those stories become progress narratives. The line doubles as manifesto and self-indictment: a call to see the whole human record, and a prompt to interrogate the frames we use when we do.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by Margaret
Add to List


