"The true science and study of man is man"
About this Quote
A deceptively modest line that smuggles in a quiet revolution: if you want real knowledge, stop chasing cosmic abstractions and look hard at the human animal. Charron, writing in late-16th-century France, is operating in the aftershock of the Renaissance and the heat of the Wars of Religion, when certainty had become a weapon and metaphysics could justify slaughter. His pivot toward "man" is less warm humanism than strategic skepticism. In a world where theologians and partisans claim access to ultimate truth, he redirects inquiry to the one terrain we can actually examine: motives, habits, appetites, self-deception.
The phrasing matters. "True" implies a counterfeit science is in circulation: systems that sound rigorous but dodge the messy evidence of lived behavior. "Science and study" pairs method with humility; Charron is not banning grand ideas, he's insisting they be accountable to what people do, not what doctrines demand. The line also carries a moral sting. If man is the proper object of study, then cruelty, fanaticism, and vanity aren't glitches in the social order; they're data. You can't fix society by polishing its theories while ignoring its psychology.
Contextually, Charron is a bridge figure between Montaigne's skeptical self-scrutiny and the later Enlightenment confidence in human-centered inquiry. The subtext is a critique of authority: understanding should be rooted in observation of human nature, not in inherited claims to certainty. It's an early argument for anthropology before the term existed, and a warning that any "science" that forgets the human subject will end up studying everything except the thing that ruins - or redeems - it.
The phrasing matters. "True" implies a counterfeit science is in circulation: systems that sound rigorous but dodge the messy evidence of lived behavior. "Science and study" pairs method with humility; Charron is not banning grand ideas, he's insisting they be accountable to what people do, not what doctrines demand. The line also carries a moral sting. If man is the proper object of study, then cruelty, fanaticism, and vanity aren't glitches in the social order; they're data. You can't fix society by polishing its theories while ignoring its psychology.
Contextually, Charron is a bridge figure between Montaigne's skeptical self-scrutiny and the later Enlightenment confidence in human-centered inquiry. The subtext is a critique of authority: understanding should be rooted in observation of human nature, not in inherited claims to certainty. It's an early argument for anthropology before the term existed, and a warning that any "science" that forgets the human subject will end up studying everything except the thing that ruins - or redeems - it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Pierre Charron, De la sagesse (Of Wisdom), 1601 — original French work commonly cited as the source of the line often translated as "The true science and study of man is man". |
More Quotes by Pierre
Add to List







