"The United Nations cannot stand by and witness the destruction of the people of West Papua"
About this Quote
It is less a plea than a dare: a moral ultimatum aimed at an institution built to move slowly. When Bernard Dowiyogo says the United Nations "cannot stand by", he’s yanking the UN out of its preferred posture - concerned observer, issuer of statements - and insisting it choose a side. The phrasing turns passivity into complicity. To "witness" destruction is not neutral; it’s to become part of the scene, a silent accessory with a good view.
Dowiyogo’s strategic genius is in how he scales West Papua’s crisis to the UN’s own self-myth. The UN exists, at least rhetorically, to prevent exactly this: the erasure of a people through violence, displacement, and political suffocation. By invoking "the people of West Papua" rather than a faction or a party, he frames the issue as collective survival, not separatist politics. "Destruction" is deliberately broad - it can mean killings, but also cultural and demographic annihilation, the slow-motion kind that gets filed as "internal security."
The context sharpens the edge. West Papua’s incorporation into Indonesia, contested ever since the 1969 "Act of Free Choice", has long been cushioned by Cold War realpolitik and the modern appetite for stability over self-determination. Dowiyogo, a Papuan political leader, speaks into that wall of indifference. The quote tries to make indifference expensive, reputationally and morally, by turning the UN’s signature language of human rights back on itself. It’s diplomacy as pressure tactic: if you won’t intervene, at least admit you watched.
Dowiyogo’s strategic genius is in how he scales West Papua’s crisis to the UN’s own self-myth. The UN exists, at least rhetorically, to prevent exactly this: the erasure of a people through violence, displacement, and political suffocation. By invoking "the people of West Papua" rather than a faction or a party, he frames the issue as collective survival, not separatist politics. "Destruction" is deliberately broad - it can mean killings, but also cultural and demographic annihilation, the slow-motion kind that gets filed as "internal security."
The context sharpens the edge. West Papua’s incorporation into Indonesia, contested ever since the 1969 "Act of Free Choice", has long been cushioned by Cold War realpolitik and the modern appetite for stability over self-determination. Dowiyogo, a Papuan political leader, speaks into that wall of indifference. The quote tries to make indifference expensive, reputationally and morally, by turning the UN’s signature language of human rights back on itself. It’s diplomacy as pressure tactic: if you won’t intervene, at least admit you watched.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Bernard
Add to List




