"The United States and Turkey are the only two countries that don't have some kind of subsidy for the Arts. The whole culture in society has made certain films more acceptable. I turned down so many films in the '60s and '70s"

In the quote by Alex North, we experience a reflection on the cultural and financial landscape for the arts within the United States and Turkey, juxtaposed against that of other countries. The central assertion is that, unlike a lot of nations, the United States and Turkey traditionally did not offer subsidies for the arts, suggesting a governmental reluctance to economically support creative undertakings like movie, music, and theater. This lack of subsidies can recommend that the arts in these countries rely more heavily on private investment and industrial success, potentially resulting in a prioritization of success over creative experimentation.

Alex North, understood for his contributions to film music, highlights an individual experience with this cultural paradigm. The quote keeps in mind that he declined lots of films throughout the 1960s and 1970s, perhaps recommending that the films he was provided did not align with his artistic values or vision. Without subsidies, artists and filmmakers might face constraints that press them towards tasks with industrial viability, potentially restricting diversity and innovation in the arts.

The recommendation to a shift in cultural reputation reflects how societal mindsets influence which movies and creative expressions are well known or ignored. North suggests that during his career, the cultural landscape may have been more limiting, with specific kinds of movies being more readily accepted than others. This could talk to broader concerns of censorship, social standards, or market needs limiting artistic expression.

North's lamentation over the absence of support could be seen as a more comprehensive critique of how capitalist imperatives can overshadow the intrinsic worth of the arts. By supporting the arts through subsidies, other countries may mitigate market pressures, allowing for more diverse, risk-taking, and authentic creative expressions.

In summary, the quote underscores the obstacles artists face in environments without public financial support, pressures that can shape the creative landscape by privileging economic success over innovative credibility or diversity.