"The U.S. and Israel probably lead the way in terms of venture investment in technologies companies focused on the security paradigm. That is quite encouraging"
About this Quote
A CEO’s optimism can be its own kind of policy proposal, and John W. Thompson’s praise for U.S.-Israel leadership in “venture investment” around a “security paradigm” is a case study in how business language quietly normalizes a worldview. “Probably lead the way” sounds modest, almost statistical, but it functions as a soft boast: the point isn’t precision, it’s positioning. By placing the U.S. and Israel at the front of the line, Thompson signals a shared innovation ecosystem where defense, surveillance, and cybersecurity are not edge sectors but the main engine.
The phrase “security paradigm” does a lot of work. It’s abstract enough to cover everything from enterprise cyber tools to border tech to predictive policing without naming any of it. That vagueness is strategic: it lets the speaker celebrate momentum while sidestepping the ethical debates that shadow security markets - who is being secured, from what, and at what civil-liberties cost. In venture terms, “security” is also a growth story: fear and uncertainty create durable demand, and “encouraging” becomes a proxy for investable.
Context matters here because U.S.-Israel tech ties have long been intertwined with military R&D spillover and a talent pipeline shaped by national security institutions. Thompson isn’t merely describing capital flows; he’s endorsing a model where geopolitical tension is converted into innovation and exits. The subtext: security tech isn’t a reluctant necessity, it’s a competitive advantage - and the moral complexity is conveniently bundled into a reassuring, boardroom-friendly noun.
The phrase “security paradigm” does a lot of work. It’s abstract enough to cover everything from enterprise cyber tools to border tech to predictive policing without naming any of it. That vagueness is strategic: it lets the speaker celebrate momentum while sidestepping the ethical debates that shadow security markets - who is being secured, from what, and at what civil-liberties cost. In venture terms, “security” is also a growth story: fear and uncertainty create durable demand, and “encouraging” becomes a proxy for investable.
Context matters here because U.S.-Israel tech ties have long been intertwined with military R&D spillover and a talent pipeline shaped by national security institutions. Thompson isn’t merely describing capital flows; he’s endorsing a model where geopolitical tension is converted into innovation and exits. The subtext: security tech isn’t a reluctant necessity, it’s a competitive advantage - and the moral complexity is conveniently bundled into a reassuring, boardroom-friendly noun.
Quote Details
| Topic | Privacy & Cybersecurity |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List

