"The U.S. has the finest research scientists in the world, but we are falling far behind other countries, like South Korea and Singapore, that are moving forward with embryonic stem cell research"
About this Quote
National pride is doing double duty here: first as a compliment, then as a warning shot. Louise Slaughter opens by flattering America’s bench talent - “the finest research scientists in the world” - and then pivots to the bruising claim that brilliance is being squandered. The line is built to make underinvestment and restriction feel not merely mistaken but humiliating: if we have the best minds, why are we losing?
Her choice of comparators is pointed. South Korea and Singapore aren’t invoked as moral models; they’re invoked as efficiency machines, countries stereotyped in U.S. political rhetoric as agile, technocratic, and unburdened by America’s culture wars. That framing turns embryonic stem cell research into a competitiveness issue rather than a bioethical dilemma. It’s a rhetorical reframing designed to pry open a debate that, in the 2000s, was stuck in the vise of abortion politics and religious objection. Slaughter’s subtext: whatever your discomfort, the rest of the world is not waiting for our conscience to catch up.
The intent is legislative pressure. By emphasizing “falling far behind,” she’s making delay itself a cost - lost patents, lost industries, lost cures, lost scientific prestige. The sentence also implies a quiet indictment of policymakers: the obstacle isn’t capacity, it’s governance. It’s a classic move from a lawmaker trying to convert an emotionally charged scientific controversy into a bread-and-butter story of jobs, innovation, and national standing - and to shame Washington into acting like a competitor rather than a preacher.
Her choice of comparators is pointed. South Korea and Singapore aren’t invoked as moral models; they’re invoked as efficiency machines, countries stereotyped in U.S. political rhetoric as agile, technocratic, and unburdened by America’s culture wars. That framing turns embryonic stem cell research into a competitiveness issue rather than a bioethical dilemma. It’s a rhetorical reframing designed to pry open a debate that, in the 2000s, was stuck in the vise of abortion politics and religious objection. Slaughter’s subtext: whatever your discomfort, the rest of the world is not waiting for our conscience to catch up.
The intent is legislative pressure. By emphasizing “falling far behind,” she’s making delay itself a cost - lost patents, lost industries, lost cures, lost scientific prestige. The sentence also implies a quiet indictment of policymakers: the obstacle isn’t capacity, it’s governance. It’s a classic move from a lawmaker trying to convert an emotionally charged scientific controversy into a bread-and-butter story of jobs, innovation, and national standing - and to shame Washington into acting like a competitor rather than a preacher.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Louise
Add to List
