"The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the questions of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?"
About this Quote
Hawking’s genius here isn’t the cosmology; it’s the rhetorical trap he sets for science itself. He starts by granting physics its most flattering self-image: disciplined, mathematical, predictive. Then he slides in the heretical move - the claim that even the best model is, at heart, a description in search of a reason. A universe can be exquisitely “solved” and still feel metaphysically unaccounted for. The line exposes a quiet anxiety at the center of modern physics: explanation keeps winning battles while meaning keeps retreating.
The phrasing does a lot of work. “The usual approach” sounds like a mild procedural note, but it’s a gentle indictment of an entire epistemology. “Cannot answer” isn’t anti-science; it’s boundary drawing, the kind that makes hardheaded empiricists nervous because it smells like theology without the incense. And then Hawking lands the punch with a joke that isn’t a joke: “go to all the bother of existing.” The cosmic question is made domestic, almost bureaucratic, as if reality has filed paperwork it didn’t need to. That everyday diction smuggles awe past the reader’s defenses.
Context matters: late-20th-century physics was increasingly confident about origin stories - inflation, quantum cosmology, grand unification dreams. Hawking was both architect and critic of that confidence. The subtext is a dare to his own tribe: if your account of the universe leaves “why anything at all” untouched, is that humility, or is it an evasion dressed up as rigor?
The phrasing does a lot of work. “The usual approach” sounds like a mild procedural note, but it’s a gentle indictment of an entire epistemology. “Cannot answer” isn’t anti-science; it’s boundary drawing, the kind that makes hardheaded empiricists nervous because it smells like theology without the incense. And then Hawking lands the punch with a joke that isn’t a joke: “go to all the bother of existing.” The cosmic question is made domestic, almost bureaucratic, as if reality has filed paperwork it didn’t need to. That everyday diction smuggles awe past the reader’s defenses.
Context matters: late-20th-century physics was increasingly confident about origin stories - inflation, quantum cosmology, grand unification dreams. Hawking was both architect and critic of that confidence. The subtext is a dare to his own tribe: if your account of the universe leaves “why anything at all” untouched, is that humility, or is it an evasion dressed up as rigor?
Quote Details
| Topic | Meaning of Life |
|---|---|
| Source | A Brief History of Time — Stephen Hawking (1988). The quoted passage is widely attributed to Hawking in this book (early discussion on why the universe exists). |
More Quotes by Stephen
Add to List



