"The value of tolerance is central to living in today's world - especially in diverse places like the Bronx"
About this Quote
Tolerance gets framed here less as a lofty virtue than as civic infrastructure: the quiet, daily practice that keeps a crowded city from grinding into tribal deadlock. Coming from Jose Serrano, a longtime Bronx congressman, the line reads as both moral claim and political positioning. He’s not describing diversity as a slogan; he’s treating it as a lived condition that requires a skill set. In that sense, “value” does double duty: tolerance is ethically good, but it’s also practically useful, a form of social competence in a borough where difference isn’t theoretical.
The choice of the Bronx matters. It’s a shorthand for layered identities - Puerto Rican and Dominican neighborhoods, Black communities, immigrant families, working-class struggles - plus the constant proximity of people who don’t share the same language, faith, or assumptions. Serrano’s subtext is that pluralism isn’t maintained by abstract ideals or federal speeches; it’s maintained by the everyday discipline of not turning conflict into contempt. His “especially” signals a rebuttal to the idea that tolerance is easiest in homogeneous places. It’s hardest where life is most intertwined.
Contextually, this kind of statement fits a late-20th/early-21st century political vocabulary: multiculturalism under pressure from culture-war polarization, post-9/11 suspicion toward immigrants and Muslims, and the perennial temptation to convert economic anxiety into scapegoating. Serrano’s intent is preventive. He’s arguing that the Bronx isn’t just proof that diversity exists; it’s evidence that coexistence is an active, fragile project - and a demand on all of us, not a favor granted to “others.”
The choice of the Bronx matters. It’s a shorthand for layered identities - Puerto Rican and Dominican neighborhoods, Black communities, immigrant families, working-class struggles - plus the constant proximity of people who don’t share the same language, faith, or assumptions. Serrano’s subtext is that pluralism isn’t maintained by abstract ideals or federal speeches; it’s maintained by the everyday discipline of not turning conflict into contempt. His “especially” signals a rebuttal to the idea that tolerance is easiest in homogeneous places. It’s hardest where life is most intertwined.
Contextually, this kind of statement fits a late-20th/early-21st century political vocabulary: multiculturalism under pressure from culture-war polarization, post-9/11 suspicion toward immigrants and Muslims, and the perennial temptation to convert economic anxiety into scapegoating. Serrano’s intent is preventive. He’s arguing that the Bronx isn’t just proof that diversity exists; it’s evidence that coexistence is an active, fragile project - and a demand on all of us, not a favor granted to “others.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Respect |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jose
Add to List





