"The values of confidentiality of matters occurring before the grand jury is very important"
About this Quote
Spoken like a man trying to wrap a political bonfire in courtroom asbestos. Kenneth Starr’s line leans hard on the soothing, institutional cadence of “values” and “very important,” a doubled-down vagueness that sounds less like moral clarity than a legal sedative. Confidentiality, in the grand jury context, is a real procedural safeguard: it protects witnesses, encourages candor, and prevents targets from gaming the investigation. Starr knows that. He also knows how convenient that principle becomes when public scrutiny is the more immediate threat.
The syntax does quiet work. “Values of confidentiality” is an abstract, almost ceremonial phrase that shifts attention away from any specific leak, decision, or actor. “Matters occurring before the grand jury” further depersonalizes the situation, turning potentially explosive details into administrative weather. Even the grammatical wobble (values… is) reads like the tell of someone speaking for effect rather than precision: the point isn’t elegance, it’s authority.
Context matters because Starr wasn’t just any lawyer; he was the independent counsel whose Clinton-era investigations helped define modern Washington’s feedback loop of law, media, and partisan appetite. In that world, confidentiality is both a shield for due process and a cudgel against accountability. The subtext is a warning: don’t ask for sunlight yet, because the system has rules. The specific intent is to reclaim legitimacy and control the narrative, not by arguing the facts, but by invoking the sanctity of the process that decides which facts are allowed to surface.
The syntax does quiet work. “Values of confidentiality” is an abstract, almost ceremonial phrase that shifts attention away from any specific leak, decision, or actor. “Matters occurring before the grand jury” further depersonalizes the situation, turning potentially explosive details into administrative weather. Even the grammatical wobble (values… is) reads like the tell of someone speaking for effect rather than precision: the point isn’t elegance, it’s authority.
Context matters because Starr wasn’t just any lawyer; he was the independent counsel whose Clinton-era investigations helped define modern Washington’s feedback loop of law, media, and partisan appetite. In that world, confidentiality is both a shield for due process and a cudgel against accountability. The subtext is a warning: don’t ask for sunlight yet, because the system has rules. The specific intent is to reclaim legitimacy and control the narrative, not by arguing the facts, but by invoking the sanctity of the process that decides which facts are allowed to surface.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Kenneth
Add to List




