"The very essence of the creative is its novelty, and hence we have no standard by which to judge it"
About this Quote
Rogers is doing something sly here: he’s stripping critics, gatekeepers, even therapists of their favorite weapon - the comforting ruler. If creativity is defined by novelty, he argues, then the moment it actually matters most, our usual measuring sticks fail. That’s not a mushy celebration of “thinking outside the box.” It’s a warning about how quickly institutions turn “evaluation” into a quiet form of control.
The intent is pragmatic and moral. As a humanistic psychologist, Rogers cared less about whether an artifact fits a canon and more about what happens inside a person when they risk making something new. Judging novelty by old standards is a category error, but it’s also a relational error: it pressures the creator to perform legibility for an audience that wants surprise without discomfort. The subtext is that the demand for standards often masks fear - of ambiguity, of wasted effort, of the possibility that the newcomer might reorder status and taste.
Context matters: mid-20th-century psychology was obsessed with measurement, typologies, and testable outcomes. Rogers is pushing back, insisting that creativity isn’t just a trait to be scored but a disruptive event. Novelty arrives before consensus; it reads as mistake before it reads as innovation. His line anticipates the modern churn of “content” metrics and algorithmic taste-making, where the new gets punished for not looking like the old winners.
The quote works because it flips a common assumption: judgment isn’t the natural partner of creativity, it’s often its adversary. Creativity, in Rogers’ frame, demands tolerance for the uncomfortable interval when we can’t yet tell what we’re looking at.
The intent is pragmatic and moral. As a humanistic psychologist, Rogers cared less about whether an artifact fits a canon and more about what happens inside a person when they risk making something new. Judging novelty by old standards is a category error, but it’s also a relational error: it pressures the creator to perform legibility for an audience that wants surprise without discomfort. The subtext is that the demand for standards often masks fear - of ambiguity, of wasted effort, of the possibility that the newcomer might reorder status and taste.
Context matters: mid-20th-century psychology was obsessed with measurement, typologies, and testable outcomes. Rogers is pushing back, insisting that creativity isn’t just a trait to be scored but a disruptive event. Novelty arrives before consensus; it reads as mistake before it reads as innovation. His line anticipates the modern churn of “content” metrics and algorithmic taste-making, where the new gets punished for not looking like the old winners.
The quote works because it flips a common assumption: judgment isn’t the natural partner of creativity, it’s often its adversary. Creativity, in Rogers’ frame, demands tolerance for the uncomfortable interval when we can’t yet tell what we’re looking at.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Carl
Add to List








