"The war we have to wage today has only one goal and that is to make the world safe for diversity"
About this Quote
A secretary-general of the United Nations choosing the word "war" to defend "diversity" is a deliberate rhetorical jolt. U Thant is borrowing the muscular moral language usually reserved for battlefields and redirecting it toward a project that sounds, at first blush, soft: pluralism. The intent is to reframe tolerance as security policy, not etiquette. Diversity, in this formulation, is not a lifestyle preference; it is the condition of survival in a post-imperial, nuclear-shadowed world where nationalisms and racial hierarchies had already proven they could scale into catastrophe.
The subtext is a rebuke to the mid-century fantasy that order comes from uniformity. After decolonization accelerated through the 1950s and 60s, the UN was swollen with newly independent states, and the Cold War tempted every conflict into an ideological proxy fight. Against that backdrop, "make the world safe" echoes Wilson's "safe for democracy" line, but U Thant tweaks the target. Democracy alone can still become majoritarian coercion; diversity insists on protections for difference inside and between states. He's arguing that peace is not the absence of conflict but the management of it without erasing identities.
There's also a quiet institutional plea embedded here: the UN's legitimacy depends on treating multiplicity as an asset, not a problem to be disciplined by great-power consensus. Calling it a "war" dramatizes the stakes and names the enemy without saying it outright: racism, chauvinism, colonial residue, and the political habit of turning difference into a casus belli.
The subtext is a rebuke to the mid-century fantasy that order comes from uniformity. After decolonization accelerated through the 1950s and 60s, the UN was swollen with newly independent states, and the Cold War tempted every conflict into an ideological proxy fight. Against that backdrop, "make the world safe" echoes Wilson's "safe for democracy" line, but U Thant tweaks the target. Democracy alone can still become majoritarian coercion; diversity insists on protections for difference inside and between states. He's arguing that peace is not the absence of conflict but the management of it without erasing identities.
There's also a quiet institutional plea embedded here: the UN's legitimacy depends on treating multiplicity as an asset, not a problem to be disciplined by great-power consensus. Calling it a "war" dramatizes the stakes and names the enemy without saying it outright: racism, chauvinism, colonial residue, and the political habit of turning difference into a casus belli.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by U
Add to List
