"The whole memorial is for different senses... seeing, hearing, feeling, smelling. I probably would have come up with something different if I had not lived through it"
About this Quote
Halprin frames the memorial less as an object to look at than an environment to move through, a choreography for the body. “Different senses” is a quiet rebuke to the stiff heroics of traditional monuments: the kind that ask you to stand at attention, read a name, feel the approved emotion, and leave. By listing seeing, hearing, feeling, smelling, he’s describing a design ethic built on immersion and disorientation, closer to landscape than pedestal. It’s also a subtle claim about legitimacy. If a memorial is meant to metabolize grief, then the body has to be involved, not just the eyes.
The second sentence is where the confession lives. “I probably would have come up with something different if I had not lived through it” signals that the memorial’s form is inseparable from trauma as lived experience, not history as abstraction. Halprin isn’t saying suffering automatically grants artistic authority; he’s admitting that proximity changes the brief. It makes sentimentality suspicious and forces attention onto sensation: the way memory arrives as sound, texture, and smell before it becomes narrative.
The context matters: Halprin’s work often treated public space as participatory performance, and postwar memorial culture was shifting toward experiential sites that could hold ambiguity without resolving it into triumph. His line implies that designing remembrance is also designing permission - to feel out of order, to remember without a script, to encounter history at human scale rather than national myth.
The second sentence is where the confession lives. “I probably would have come up with something different if I had not lived through it” signals that the memorial’s form is inseparable from trauma as lived experience, not history as abstraction. Halprin isn’t saying suffering automatically grants artistic authority; he’s admitting that proximity changes the brief. It makes sentimentality suspicious and forces attention onto sensation: the way memory arrives as sound, texture, and smell before it becomes narrative.
The context matters: Halprin’s work often treated public space as participatory performance, and postwar memorial culture was shifting toward experiential sites that could hold ambiguity without resolving it into triumph. His line implies that designing remembrance is also designing permission - to feel out of order, to remember without a script, to encounter history at human scale rather than national myth.
Quote Details
| Topic | Legacy & Remembrance |
|---|
More Quotes by Lawrence
Add to List
