"The wisdom of crowds works when the crowd is choosing the price of an ox, when there's a single numeric average. But if it's a design or something that matters, the decision is made by committee, and that's crap. You want people and groups who are able to think thoughts before they share"
About this Quote
Lanier is taking a scalpel to Silicon Valley's favorite bedtime story: that "the crowd" is inherently smart. He concedes the narrow case where aggregation shines - markets, estimates, anything that collapses into a single number. Pricing an ox is a neat little parable because it flatters data logic: many imperfect guesses converge on something usable. It's also a reminder that crowds do best when the problem is already defined, the criteria agreed upon, and the output measurable.
Then he pivots to where the ideology breaks: design, taste, ethics, meaning. These are not averaging problems; they're argument problems. "Committee" becomes a slur here, not because collaboration is bad, but because committee-thinking often turns creative work into negotiated mush, optimized for least offense rather than most insight. Calling it "crap" is deliberate vulgarity: he's puncturing a technocratic pretension with the language of someone who's watched too many bold ideas die in meeting notes.
The key line is the quiet one: "think thoughts before they share". That's not just about introversion; it's about incubation. Networked culture rewards instant reactions, performative consensus, and the dopamine of being first. Lanier's subtext is that constant sharing doesn't produce collective intelligence; it produces collective reflexes. Coming from an artist who helped build early VR - someone deeply inside the machinery of digital culture - the warning lands as insider critique: platforms can aggregate signals, but they can't manufacture judgment, and they often corrode the solitude that judgment requires.
Then he pivots to where the ideology breaks: design, taste, ethics, meaning. These are not averaging problems; they're argument problems. "Committee" becomes a slur here, not because collaboration is bad, but because committee-thinking often turns creative work into negotiated mush, optimized for least offense rather than most insight. Calling it "crap" is deliberate vulgarity: he's puncturing a technocratic pretension with the language of someone who's watched too many bold ideas die in meeting notes.
The key line is the quiet one: "think thoughts before they share". That's not just about introversion; it's about incubation. Networked culture rewards instant reactions, performative consensus, and the dopamine of being first. Lanier's subtext is that constant sharing doesn't produce collective intelligence; it produces collective reflexes. Coming from an artist who helped build early VR - someone deeply inside the machinery of digital culture - the warning lands as insider critique: platforms can aggregate signals, but they can't manufacture judgment, and they often corrode the solitude that judgment requires.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jaron
Add to List






