"The world changes materially. Science makes advances in technology and understanding. But the world of humanity doesn't change"
About this Quote
Schaeffer lands the line like a cold splice of tape: the future keeps arriving, but the human signal stays stubbornly the same. Coming from a composer who helped invent musique concrete - literally building music out of recorded machinery, footsteps, trains, radios - the observation isn’t generic pessimism. It’s a studio-born insight: you can transform the material world endlessly, re-edit reality into new forms, and still hear the old emotional frequencies underneath.
The first sentence flatters modernity with a brisk, almost scientific cadence: materially, measurably, yes, we progress. Then the pivot: “But the world of humanity doesn’t change.” The bluntness is the point. Schaeffer isn’t arguing that people never learn; he’s puncturing the techno-messianic belief that better tools produce better selves. In the mid-century moment he lived through - two world wars, propaganda machines, nuclear anxiety, broadcast culture - “advances in understanding” coexisted with industrial-scale cruelty. That tension gives the quote its bite.
Subtextually, it’s also a warning to artists and engineers alike. New mediums (radio, tape, synthesizers) don’t automatically deliver new ethics; they amplify whatever motives are already there: vanity, fear, desire, control, tenderness. Schaeffer’s craft was all about extracting meaning from noise. Here he suggests the opposite lesson: the more dazzling the technology, the easier it is to mistake louder, faster change for moral evolution.
The first sentence flatters modernity with a brisk, almost scientific cadence: materially, measurably, yes, we progress. Then the pivot: “But the world of humanity doesn’t change.” The bluntness is the point. Schaeffer isn’t arguing that people never learn; he’s puncturing the techno-messianic belief that better tools produce better selves. In the mid-century moment he lived through - two world wars, propaganda machines, nuclear anxiety, broadcast culture - “advances in understanding” coexisted with industrial-scale cruelty. That tension gives the quote its bite.
Subtextually, it’s also a warning to artists and engineers alike. New mediums (radio, tape, synthesizers) don’t automatically deliver new ethics; they amplify whatever motives are already there: vanity, fear, desire, control, tenderness. Schaeffer’s craft was all about extracting meaning from noise. Here he suggests the opposite lesson: the more dazzling the technology, the easier it is to mistake louder, faster change for moral evolution.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Pierre
Add to List








