"The world has fundamentally changed. It fundamentally changed when the Berlin Wall came down and the 'evil empire' ceased to exist. We are engaged around the world whether we like it or not"
About this Quote
Bennett’s line is Cold War whiplash turned into a governing philosophy: the familiar map has been torn up, and the United States doesn’t get to pretend it’s optional reading. By anchoring the “fundamental” shift to two iconic phrases - the Berlin Wall and “evil empire” - he’s invoking not just events but a whole moral script Americans were trained to inhabit. The enemy was legible, the stakes were binary, and leadership meant containment. When that story ends, Bennett argues, disengagement isn’t the reward; it’s a delusion.
The repetition of “fundamentally” is doing political work. It’s less emphasis than preemption, a way to shut down nostalgia and isolate skeptics as people living in yesterday’s world. He’s also quietly laundering a contested idea into inevitability: “we are engaged...whether we like it or not” frames intervention, alliance maintenance, trade entanglement, and forward basing not as choices made by policymakers but as physics. That move is strategic, because it shifts accountability away from decision-makers and toward circumstance.
Context matters. Bennett came up in the Reagan-era Republican coalition that treated American primacy as both moral mission and security policy. Post-1989, that coalition had to justify an active global role without a single organizing villain. This quote is part of that pivot: it turns the end of the Cold War into an argument for permanence, not peace dividends. The subtext is clear: if you resist global engagement, you’re not cautious - you’re unserious about the new century’s risks.
The repetition of “fundamentally” is doing political work. It’s less emphasis than preemption, a way to shut down nostalgia and isolate skeptics as people living in yesterday’s world. He’s also quietly laundering a contested idea into inevitability: “we are engaged...whether we like it or not” frames intervention, alliance maintenance, trade entanglement, and forward basing not as choices made by policymakers but as physics. That move is strategic, because it shifts accountability away from decision-makers and toward circumstance.
Context matters. Bennett came up in the Reagan-era Republican coalition that treated American primacy as both moral mission and security policy. Post-1989, that coalition had to justify an active global role without a single organizing villain. This quote is part of that pivot: it turns the end of the Cold War into an argument for permanence, not peace dividends. The subtext is clear: if you resist global engagement, you’re not cautious - you’re unserious about the new century’s risks.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List








