"The world is not dialectical - it is sworn to extremes, not to equilibrium, sworn to radical antagonism, not to reconciliation or synthesis. This is also the principle of evil"
About this Quote
Baudrillard doesn’t just reject the comforting Hegelian story that history resolves itself through synthesis; he mocks the very desire for resolution as a kind of philosophical self-soothing. “The world is not dialectical” is a provocation aimed at any politics or theory that treats conflict as a temporary phase on the way to balance. In his framing, the real engine of events isn’t a rational progression toward equilibrium but a centrifugal pull toward polarities: escalation, saturation, rupture. The sentence is built like a manifesto against moderation, with “sworn” doing key work. Extremes aren’t accidental outcomes; they’re a vow the world keeps, an oath that makes reconciliation feel less like wisdom and more like denial.
The subtext is a warning about the modern habit of translating antagonism into manageable debate. Baudrillard’s late-20th-century context matters: consumer society, media spectacle, and the rise of “systems” that claim to absorb dissent by representing it. For him, the dialectic becomes part of the machinery of domestication: if every conflict can be “integrated,” then nothing is truly opposed. Calling radical antagonism “the principle of evil” is deliberately inflammatory, but it’s not a sermon about morality. “Evil” here is the irreducible remainder - what refuses assimilation, what disrupts the smooth functioning of consensus, markets, and meaning.
It works because it flips the usual ethical script: reconciliation is not automatically good, extremity not automatically bad. Baudrillard is insisting that the world’s most consequential forces don’t negotiate; they collide.
The subtext is a warning about the modern habit of translating antagonism into manageable debate. Baudrillard’s late-20th-century context matters: consumer society, media spectacle, and the rise of “systems” that claim to absorb dissent by representing it. For him, the dialectic becomes part of the machinery of domestication: if every conflict can be “integrated,” then nothing is truly opposed. Calling radical antagonism “the principle of evil” is deliberately inflammatory, but it’s not a sermon about morality. “Evil” here is the irreducible remainder - what refuses assimilation, what disrupts the smooth functioning of consensus, markets, and meaning.
It works because it flips the usual ethical script: reconciliation is not automatically good, extremity not automatically bad. Baudrillard is insisting that the world’s most consequential forces don’t negotiate; they collide.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jean
Add to List






