"The writer in western civilization has become not a voice of his tribe, but of his individuality. This is a very narrow-minded situation"
About this Quote
Appelfeld lands the knife gently: Western literature prides itself on the solitary genius, the singular “voice,” and he’s suggesting that this triumph has curdled into a kind of cultural myopia. The line turns on a reversal. Individuality is supposed to be liberation from the tribe; Appelfeld frames it as confinement. “Very narrow-minded” isn’t prudish scolding so much as a diagnosis: when a writer is trained to speak primarily as a self, the horizon of obligation shrinks to private sensibility, personal brand, confessional texture. The tribe here isn’t nationalism or blind conformity; it’s a shared moral and historical fabric - memory, language, responsibility, the messy chorus of a people.
The subtext comes into focus against Appelfeld’s biography and subject matter. A Holocaust survivor who wrote in Hebrew while haunted by European Jewish worlds that were shattered, he understood literature as a vessel for collective memory, not just a stage for self-expression. In that light, “western civilization” reads as both a target and a temptation: a culture that markets the writer as an exceptional personality, rewarded for originality, punished for speaking in inherited idioms. He’s wary of a modernist posture that treats tradition as baggage and community as threat.
The intent is almost corrective. Appelfeld isn’t arguing for propaganda or groupthink; he’s arguing that literature loses amplitude when it abandons the communal register. A writer who can’t be “a voice of his tribe” may still be brilliant, but brilliance alone can’t carry history.
The subtext comes into focus against Appelfeld’s biography and subject matter. A Holocaust survivor who wrote in Hebrew while haunted by European Jewish worlds that were shattered, he understood literature as a vessel for collective memory, not just a stage for self-expression. In that light, “western civilization” reads as both a target and a temptation: a culture that markets the writer as an exceptional personality, rewarded for originality, punished for speaking in inherited idioms. He’s wary of a modernist posture that treats tradition as baggage and community as threat.
The intent is almost corrective. Appelfeld isn’t arguing for propaganda or groupthink; he’s arguing that literature loses amplitude when it abandons the communal register. A writer who can’t be “a voice of his tribe” may still be brilliant, but brilliance alone can’t carry history.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Aharon
Add to List









