"Their coverage on the Fox News Channel has been atrocious. The stuff that comes out of Sean Hannity's mouth has been infuriating. The stuff that Bill O'Reilly says has been illogical. You go up and down the schedule and it's insanity over there. The number of lies, perpetuated, promoted by Fox News is just shameful and it hurts everybody"
About this Quote
Shuster isn’t offering a media critique so much as issuing an alarm: Fox isn’t merely getting stories wrong, it’s manufacturing a reality in which wrongness is the product. The line works because it refuses the comfortable language of “bias” and “spin” and instead leans on moral vocabulary - “shameful,” “hurts everybody” - that treats misinformation as public harm, not partisan entertainment. He’s trying to move the argument out of the sandbox of opinion and into the realm of consequences.
The rhetorical structure is deliberate escalation. “Atrocious” sets the temperature, then he personalizes the grievance by naming Hannity and O’Reilly as avatars of a broader system. Calling Hannity “infuriating” and O’Reilly “illogical” draws a neat contrast: one agitates emotions, the other mangles reason. Together they sketch a machine that can capture viewers whether they’re looking to feel or to think. The “up and down the schedule” sweep widens the indictment from star personalities to institutional culture - not a few bad segments, but a network logic.
Subtextually, Shuster is policing professional boundaries. As a journalist, he’s defending a vanishing premise: that there’s a shared baseline of facts media actors are obligated to respect. His final claim, that it “hurts everybody,” is both ethical appeal and strategic framing. He’s inviting even non-liberals to see the damage as civic, not tribal: when a major outlet normalizes lying, it corrodes trust, contaminates the information ecosystem, and makes democratic disagreement impossible to referee.
The rhetorical structure is deliberate escalation. “Atrocious” sets the temperature, then he personalizes the grievance by naming Hannity and O’Reilly as avatars of a broader system. Calling Hannity “infuriating” and O’Reilly “illogical” draws a neat contrast: one agitates emotions, the other mangles reason. Together they sketch a machine that can capture viewers whether they’re looking to feel or to think. The “up and down the schedule” sweep widens the indictment from star personalities to institutional culture - not a few bad segments, but a network logic.
Subtextually, Shuster is policing professional boundaries. As a journalist, he’s defending a vanishing premise: that there’s a shared baseline of facts media actors are obligated to respect. His final claim, that it “hurts everybody,” is both ethical appeal and strategic framing. He’s inviting even non-liberals to see the damage as civic, not tribal: when a major outlet normalizes lying, it corrodes trust, contaminates the information ecosystem, and makes democratic disagreement impossible to referee.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|
More Quotes by David
Add to List

