"Then we can help these failed states turn around and give their people a better life. This, too, is a critical part of this global war on terrorism, and Canada and the United States are together"
About this Quote
“Failed states” is doing the heavy lifting here: a technocratic label that turns messy histories into a solvable policy problem. Cellucci’s intent is salesmanship for a post-9/11 worldview in which development aid, state-building, and military strategy blur into one “global war on terrorism” portfolio. The phrasing promises uplift - “give their people a better life” - but it’s also a security argument dressed in humanitarian clothes. Help them, because instability over there becomes danger over here.
The subtext is alliance maintenance. “Canada and the United States are together” isn’t merely descriptive; it’s a reassurance and a nudge, an attempt to keep Canada politically tethered to Washington’s framing of the era. By placing state-building inside the war on terror, Cellucci makes cooperation feel not just virtuous but mandatory. The sentence structure is calibrated to lower the moral temperature of coercive policy: “turn around” implies a gentle correction rather than the hard realities of intervention, conditional aid, or regime change.
Context matters: early-2000s North American diplomacy leaned on a simple story about ungoverned spaces breeding extremism. That story was rhetorically powerful because it offered an actionable map: fix governance, reduce terror. It also conveniently sidestepped uncomfortable questions about how some “failed” conditions were produced - by Cold War meddling, resource extraction, or debt politics. Cellucci’s line works because it fuses empathy and threat into one seamless imperative, leaving dissent to sound like abandonment or naivete.
The subtext is alliance maintenance. “Canada and the United States are together” isn’t merely descriptive; it’s a reassurance and a nudge, an attempt to keep Canada politically tethered to Washington’s framing of the era. By placing state-building inside the war on terror, Cellucci makes cooperation feel not just virtuous but mandatory. The sentence structure is calibrated to lower the moral temperature of coercive policy: “turn around” implies a gentle correction rather than the hard realities of intervention, conditional aid, or regime change.
Context matters: early-2000s North American diplomacy leaned on a simple story about ungoverned spaces breeding extremism. That story was rhetorically powerful because it offered an actionable map: fix governance, reduce terror. It also conveniently sidestepped uncomfortable questions about how some “failed” conditions were produced - by Cold War meddling, resource extraction, or debt politics. Cellucci’s line works because it fuses empathy and threat into one seamless imperative, leaving dissent to sound like abandonment or naivete.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List
