"There are always at least five good films at the end of the year to get nominated, but generally speaking nowadays, it's more of the independent films that are recognized"
About this Quote
Awards season likes to pretend it is a meritocracy with a calendar. Rydell punctures that polite fiction by pointing out the built-in scarcity that makes the Oscars feel inevitable: by late December, there will always be “at least five good films” ready to be crowned, because the system requires a neat shortlist whether the year was truly great or merely serviceable. The line is less a complaint about quality than about how quality gets organized, packaged, and sold.
His pivot to independent films is doing quiet cultural bookkeeping. It acknowledges a real shift in prestige economics: the Academy has increasingly rewarded movies that wear “seriousness” like a costume budget can’t buy - intimate dramas, riskier subjects, director-forward storytelling - precisely because studio tentpoles now function as IP maintenance, not adult conversation. In that landscape, “independent” becomes a proxy for authenticity, even when those films are financed, marketed, and campaigned with industrial precision.
The subtext is a veteran director reading the room: awards recognition has become less about the broad center of American cinema and more about a curated corner that signals taste. It’s also a small warning about gatekeeping disguised as progress. If the same kind of indie-coded film keeps getting “recognized,” then recognition itself becomes a genre, with its own formulas, release strategies, and voters’ expectations.
Rydell isn’t romanticizing indies so much as noting the Academy’s current alibi: when the mainstream is noise, the ballot chases the whisper that sounds like art.
His pivot to independent films is doing quiet cultural bookkeeping. It acknowledges a real shift in prestige economics: the Academy has increasingly rewarded movies that wear “seriousness” like a costume budget can’t buy - intimate dramas, riskier subjects, director-forward storytelling - precisely because studio tentpoles now function as IP maintenance, not adult conversation. In that landscape, “independent” becomes a proxy for authenticity, even when those films are financed, marketed, and campaigned with industrial precision.
The subtext is a veteran director reading the room: awards recognition has become less about the broad center of American cinema and more about a curated corner that signals taste. It’s also a small warning about gatekeeping disguised as progress. If the same kind of indie-coded film keeps getting “recognized,” then recognition itself becomes a genre, with its own formulas, release strategies, and voters’ expectations.
Rydell isn’t romanticizing indies so much as noting the Academy’s current alibi: when the mainstream is noise, the ballot chases the whisper that sounds like art.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Mark
Add to List
