"There are but few naval powers, but there are many land powers"
About this Quote
The subtext is about hierarchy. Naval strength isn’t simply another category of military might; it’s a multiplier that turns geography into leverage. A land power is constrained by borders and neighbors. A naval power can choose where to appear, where to trade, where to blockade, where to intimidate. The phrase quietly naturalizes inequality among states: some countries get to be global, most are stuck being regional.
Kellogg’s era matters. He served as U.S. Secretary of State in the 1920s, when the United States was wrestling with its post-World War I identity: retreating into “normalcy” rhetorically while expanding its economic reach and bargaining over naval limits (the Washington Naval Conference) to prevent an arms race. Read against that backdrop, the line functions as realist justification for why naval questions dominate diplomacy. If only a few actors can truly command the seas, then those actors set the rules, police the lanes, and decide what “security” means for everyone else.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Kellogg, Frank B. (2026, January 15). There are but few naval powers, but there are many land powers. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-are-but-few-naval-powers-but-there-are-many-143839/
Chicago Style
Kellogg, Frank B. "There are but few naval powers, but there are many land powers." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-are-but-few-naval-powers-but-there-are-many-143839/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"There are but few naval powers, but there are many land powers." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-are-but-few-naval-powers-but-there-are-many-143839/. Accessed 17 Feb. 2026.








