"There are but few naval powers, but there are many land powers"
About this Quote
A cool little line with a hard-edged worldview tucked inside it: the sea is an exclusive club; the land is a crowded street. Kellogg is making a strategic argument that doubles as a status map. “Few naval powers” implies not just rarity but gatekeeping. Building and sustaining a navy requires industrial capacity, shipyards, fuel networks, overseas basing rights, trained personnel, and the political will to bankroll all of it for decades. Most states can field an army; far fewer can project force across oceans and keep it there.
The subtext is about hierarchy. Naval strength isn’t simply another category of military might; it’s a multiplier that turns geography into leverage. A land power is constrained by borders and neighbors. A naval power can choose where to appear, where to trade, where to blockade, where to intimidate. The phrase quietly naturalizes inequality among states: some countries get to be global, most are stuck being regional.
Kellogg’s era matters. He served as U.S. Secretary of State in the 1920s, when the United States was wrestling with its post-World War I identity: retreating into “normalcy” rhetorically while expanding its economic reach and bargaining over naval limits (the Washington Naval Conference) to prevent an arms race. Read against that backdrop, the line functions as realist justification for why naval questions dominate diplomacy. If only a few actors can truly command the seas, then those actors set the rules, police the lanes, and decide what “security” means for everyone else.
The subtext is about hierarchy. Naval strength isn’t simply another category of military might; it’s a multiplier that turns geography into leverage. A land power is constrained by borders and neighbors. A naval power can choose where to appear, where to trade, where to blockade, where to intimidate. The phrase quietly naturalizes inequality among states: some countries get to be global, most are stuck being regional.
Kellogg’s era matters. He served as U.S. Secretary of State in the 1920s, when the United States was wrestling with its post-World War I identity: retreating into “normalcy” rhetorically while expanding its economic reach and bargaining over naval limits (the Washington Naval Conference) to prevent an arms race. Read against that backdrop, the line functions as realist justification for why naval questions dominate diplomacy. If only a few actors can truly command the seas, then those actors set the rules, police the lanes, and decide what “security” means for everyone else.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Frank
Add to List








