"There are growing concerns that oil companies are making too much in profits at the expense of consumers"
About this Quote
It sounds like a populist jab at Big Oil, but coming from a career politician, it reads more like a calibrated pressure valve than a crusade. “Growing concerns” is the tell: the sentence displaces agency onto the public mood, letting Domenici echo anger without fully owning it. He’s not declaring that oil companies are profiteering; he’s reporting that people are starting to worry they might be. That framing keeps him safely positioned between two powerful constituencies: consumers feeling fleeced at the pump and an energy industry with money, leverage, and jobs to point to.
The phrase “making too much in profits” is deliberately blunt, almost folksy, and it taps into a basic American suspicion of windfalls that look unearned. It also sidesteps harder questions about how oil markets work, what counts as “too much,” and whether high prices are driven by corporate behavior, global supply shocks, or policy constraints. By choosing moral language (“at the expense of consumers”) over technical language, Domenici turns price pain into a story with villains and victims, which is politically useful when voters want accountability now, not a seminar on commodities.
Context matters: this kind of line typically surfaces when gas prices spike and incumbents need to look responsive without committing to policies that could disrupt domestic production or alienate donors. The subtext is a warning shot: behave, or we’ll talk regulation, windfall taxes, investigations. It’s politics as thermostat - not changing the weather, just trying to keep the room from boiling.
The phrase “making too much in profits” is deliberately blunt, almost folksy, and it taps into a basic American suspicion of windfalls that look unearned. It also sidesteps harder questions about how oil markets work, what counts as “too much,” and whether high prices are driven by corporate behavior, global supply shocks, or policy constraints. By choosing moral language (“at the expense of consumers”) over technical language, Domenici turns price pain into a story with villains and victims, which is politically useful when voters want accountability now, not a seminar on commodities.
Context matters: this kind of line typically surfaces when gas prices spike and incumbents need to look responsive without committing to policies that could disrupt domestic production or alienate donors. The subtext is a warning shot: behave, or we’ll talk regulation, windfall taxes, investigations. It’s politics as thermostat - not changing the weather, just trying to keep the room from boiling.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Pete
Add to List
