"There are lots of countries around that have weapons of mass destruction. We can't presumably attack them all"
About this Quote
The subtext is a critique of selective outrage. WMD, in political speech, rarely functions as neutral description; it’s a permission slip. Graham is asking who gets labeled intolerable and who gets treated as a manageable problem - and why. By pointing to the impossibility of attacking “them all,” he exposes the hidden criteria that actually determine intervention: alliances, strategic value, domestic politics, public fear. The quote quietly shifts the debate from “Are WMD unacceptable?” to “What are we really willing to do, consistently, if we claim they are?”
Contextually, it reads like a restraint argument in an era when security threats were increasingly global but military solutions remained the first, most legible tool. Graham isn’t romantic about diplomacy; he’s warning against a doctrine that can’t survive contact with arithmetic. The power of the line is its refusal to perform righteousness. It performs limits instead.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Graham, Bill. (2026, January 14). There are lots of countries around that have weapons of mass destruction. We can't presumably attack them all. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-are-lots-of-countries-around-that-have-124429/
Chicago Style
Graham, Bill. "There are lots of countries around that have weapons of mass destruction. We can't presumably attack them all." FixQuotes. January 14, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-are-lots-of-countries-around-that-have-124429/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"There are lots of countries around that have weapons of mass destruction. We can't presumably attack them all." FixQuotes, 14 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-are-lots-of-countries-around-that-have-124429/. Accessed 4 Feb. 2026.



