"There are moments when very little truth would be enough to shape opinion. One might be hated at extremely low cost"
About this Quote
Rostand’s line lands like a lab note written in acid: public opinion is a reaction that doesn’t require much reagent. “Very little truth” isn’t a plea for honesty so much as a warning about dosage. A trace amount of fact, strategically placed, can catalyze a whole social conclusion. The sentence doesn’t celebrate truth; it demotes truth to an ingredient that can be weaponized, diluted, or used as a garnish on a far larger dish of insinuation.
The second clause sharpens the cynicism. “One might be hated at extremely low cost” frames hatred as an efficient market: the supply chain is cheap, the demand is constant, and the consumer doesn’t insist on rigorous sourcing. Rostand, a scientist, is translating social behavior into something like thermodynamics: small inputs, large outputs. That framing matters. Coming from a biologist and public intellectual in a century of propaganda, ideological purges, and mass-media acceleration, the quote reads as fieldwork from modernity’s worst experiments.
The subtext is a critique of our appetite for partial evidence. People don’t need a full account to convict; they need just enough truth to feel licensed. A single accurate detail can launder a larger falsehood, giving it the clean scent of credibility. Rostand is also pointing at the asymmetry of reputational damage: building trust is expensive; triggering suspicion is bargain-priced.
Intent-wise, it’s less misanthropy than prophylaxis. He’s urging intellectual hygiene: demand more than “a little truth,” because that’s exactly what hatred requires.
The second clause sharpens the cynicism. “One might be hated at extremely low cost” frames hatred as an efficient market: the supply chain is cheap, the demand is constant, and the consumer doesn’t insist on rigorous sourcing. Rostand, a scientist, is translating social behavior into something like thermodynamics: small inputs, large outputs. That framing matters. Coming from a biologist and public intellectual in a century of propaganda, ideological purges, and mass-media acceleration, the quote reads as fieldwork from modernity’s worst experiments.
The subtext is a critique of our appetite for partial evidence. People don’t need a full account to convict; they need just enough truth to feel licensed. A single accurate detail can launder a larger falsehood, giving it the clean scent of credibility. Rostand is also pointing at the asymmetry of reputational damage: building trust is expensive; triggering suspicion is bargain-priced.
Intent-wise, it’s less misanthropy than prophylaxis. He’s urging intellectual hygiene: demand more than “a little truth,” because that’s exactly what hatred requires.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Jean
Add to List








