"There are no hard distinctions between what is real and what is unreal, nor between what is true and what is false. A thing is not necessarily either true or false; it can be both true and false"
About this Quote
The subtext is power. If truth isn’t a fixed pole but a contested space, then whoever controls language, timing, and intimidation controls what counts as reality. That’s why Pinter’s dialogue is so full of evasions, repetitions, banalities that turn menacing, and above all silence. Pauses don’t merely indicate absence; they’re weapons, moments where the unspoken version of events asserts itself. A thing can be “both true and false” because people are rarely lying in a simple way: they’re self-mythologizing, protecting themselves, testing dominance, rewriting memory in real time.
Context matters: Pinter emerges from postwar Britain, where public narratives of order and decency sat beside private anxieties about class, violence, and institutional authority. Later, his political voice sharpened this idea into outright accusation: states manufacture “truth” through repetition and managed spectacle. This quote is his artistic manifesto and his civic warning. Once you accept blurred borders, the question stops being “What happened?” and becomes “Who gets to say what happened, and what happens to you if you disagree?”
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|---|
| Source | Verified source: Art, Truth & Politics (Nobel Lecture) (Harold Pinter, 2005)
Evidence: In 1958 I wrote the following: ‘There are no hard distinctions between what is real and what is unreal, nor between what is true and what is false. A thing is not necessarily either true or false; it can be both true and false.’. Primary-source verification: the wording appears verbatim in Harold Pinter’s Nobel Lecture, pre-recorded and shown on 7 December 2005 at the Swedish Academy in Stockholm. ([nobelprize.org](https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/2005/pinter/lecture/)) About “FIRST published or spoken”: in the Nobel lecture Pinter explicitly says he wrote it in 1958, but the lecture itself does not identify the 1958 venue. A strong candidate for the *first publication* is Pinter’s letter to the editor in the student theatre paper "The Play’s the Thing" (October 1958). That 1958 letter text includes the same sentences verbatim, and is reproduced in a later primary collection, "Various Voices" (published 1998). However, because I cannot (from accessible sources here) verify the October 1958 issue directly (scan/library record with page), I cannot conclusively state the *first* appearance beyond Pinter’s own 1958 claim. ([groveatlantic.com](https://groveatlantic.com/book/various-voices/)) Other candidates (1) An Epistemic Theory of Democracy (Robert E. Goodin, Kai Spiekermann, 2018) compilation99.2% ... There are no hard distinctions between what is real and what is unreal, nor between what is true and what is fals... |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Pinter, Harold. (2026, February 15). There are no hard distinctions between what is real and what is unreal, nor between what is true and what is false. A thing is not necessarily either true or false; it can be both true and false. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-are-no-hard-distinctions-between-what-is-34011/
Chicago Style
Pinter, Harold. "There are no hard distinctions between what is real and what is unreal, nor between what is true and what is false. A thing is not necessarily either true or false; it can be both true and false." FixQuotes. February 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-are-no-hard-distinctions-between-what-is-34011/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"There are no hard distinctions between what is real and what is unreal, nor between what is true and what is false. A thing is not necessarily either true or false; it can be both true and false." FixQuotes, 15 Feb. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-are-no-hard-distinctions-between-what-is-34011/. Accessed 7 Mar. 2026.








