"There are no rules. That is how art is born, how breakthroughs happen. Go against the rules or ignore the rules. That is what invention is about"
About this Quote
Frankenthaler’s line isn’t a misty-eyed hymn to “creativity.” It’s a hard-edged permission slip issued from inside a very specific battlefield: postwar American painting, where “rules” were everywhere even when the rhetoric insisted they weren’t. By the time she poured thinned paint into raw canvas, the New York art world had already built a new orthodoxy around Abstract Expressionism: authenticity, heroic gesture, the macho mythology of the tortured genius. Her breakthrough didn’t arrive by politely joining that club; it arrived by short-circuiting its rituals.
“There are no rules” works because it’s both manifesto and misdirection. Art absolutely has constraints - material, historical, social, bodily. What she’s rejecting is rule-as-deference: the invisible pressures that tell an artist what counts as “serious,” what methods are respectable, whose risk looks like innovation and whose looks like failure. Her soak-stain technique reads, in that light, as an argument: the canvas isn’t a window to be filled or a stage for performance; it’s a field where paint can behave on its own terms.
The subtext is pragmatic, not romantic. “Go against” and “ignore” split rebellion into two modes: confrontation (fighting the canon) and indifference (walking past it). That second option is the sharper one. Indifference is how you stop making work that auditions for approval. “Invention,” here, isn’t novelty for novelty’s sake; it’s the refusal to let inherited taste be the ceiling on what’s possible.
“There are no rules” works because it’s both manifesto and misdirection. Art absolutely has constraints - material, historical, social, bodily. What she’s rejecting is rule-as-deference: the invisible pressures that tell an artist what counts as “serious,” what methods are respectable, whose risk looks like innovation and whose looks like failure. Her soak-stain technique reads, in that light, as an argument: the canvas isn’t a window to be filled or a stage for performance; it’s a field where paint can behave on its own terms.
The subtext is pragmatic, not romantic. “Go against” and “ignore” split rebellion into two modes: confrontation (fighting the canon) and indifference (walking past it). That second option is the sharper one. Indifference is how you stop making work that auditions for approval. “Invention,” here, isn’t novelty for novelty’s sake; it’s the refusal to let inherited taste be the ceiling on what’s possible.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Helen
Add to List




