"There are obviously two educations. One should teach us how to make a living and the other how to live"
About this Quote
Adams draws a clean, almost irritatingly sensible line between competence and meaning, then dares you to notice how often modern societies pretend the line doesn’t exist. “Two educations” is a tidy formulation with a sharp edge: one education produces employable citizens; the other produces people capable of judging what employment is for. The sentence works because it’s structured like a truism while smuggling in an indictment. If the distinction is “obvious,” why do institutions, budgets, and parental anxieties keep behaving as if only one kind counts?
As a historian writing in the early 20th century, Adams is speaking from an America being remade by industrialization, mass schooling, and a new managerial class. Education was increasingly sold as social mobility and national efficiency: credentials as lifeboats. His phrasing echoes that moment’s faith in systems, but the subtext is skeptical. The first education is transactional and measurable; it has syllabi, outcomes, salaries. The second is messy: ethics, taste, civic courage, the ability to endure uncertainty without grabbing for slogans. Adams suggests that a civilization can become brilliantly trained and spiritually untrained at the same time.
The quiet provocation is that “how to live” is not a decorative add-on to “making a living”; it’s the standard by which “making” should be evaluated. Without that second education, prosperity becomes a kind of elaborate busyness, and democracy becomes a workforce management project. Adams isn’t romanticizing the humanities so much as warning that skill without orientation is a powerful engine with no destination.
As a historian writing in the early 20th century, Adams is speaking from an America being remade by industrialization, mass schooling, and a new managerial class. Education was increasingly sold as social mobility and national efficiency: credentials as lifeboats. His phrasing echoes that moment’s faith in systems, but the subtext is skeptical. The first education is transactional and measurable; it has syllabi, outcomes, salaries. The second is messy: ethics, taste, civic courage, the ability to endure uncertainty without grabbing for slogans. Adams suggests that a civilization can become brilliantly trained and spiritually untrained at the same time.
The quiet provocation is that “how to live” is not a decorative add-on to “making a living”; it’s the standard by which “making” should be evaluated. Without that second education, prosperity becomes a kind of elaborate busyness, and democracy becomes a workforce management project. Adams isn’t romanticizing the humanities so much as warning that skill without orientation is a powerful engine with no destination.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|---|
| Source | James Truslow Adams, The Epic of America (1931). |
More Quotes by James
Add to List








