"There are so few directors who are musical who appreciate music"
About this Quote
North’s line lands like a composer’s weary punchline: the people with the most power over film music often don’t really hear it. Coming from a Hollywood composer who worked under the studio system and later through the era of “temp tracks,” it’s not just complaint, it’s diagnosis. Directors, North implies, may love the idea of music - the swell, the prestige, the emotional insurance policy - without possessing the musical literacy to treat it as a language with grammar, tension, and consequence.
The sting is in “musical” versus “appreciate.” Being “musical” isn’t simply enjoying records; it’s sensitivity to rhythm, harmony, phrasing, and how sound edits against image. “Appreciate” is respect in practice: giving music space, not drowning it in dialogue, not demanding it mimic a placeholder cue because the cut has become addicted to it, not treating the score as a last-minute adhesive for narrative problems.
Subtextually, North is talking about hierarchy. Film music is collaborative on paper but subordinate in reality, and the composer is often asked to be both artist and technician: deliver emotion on command, fix pacing, disappear when it works. His irony is that the medium most reliant on music’s invisible labor is run by people who may not understand its mechanics.
It also hints at a broader cultural blind spot: cinema celebrates auteurs, while music is expected to be “support.” North’s frustration is aesthetic, but it’s also political - a reminder that taste isn’t the same as craft, and authority doesn’t guarantee listening.
The sting is in “musical” versus “appreciate.” Being “musical” isn’t simply enjoying records; it’s sensitivity to rhythm, harmony, phrasing, and how sound edits against image. “Appreciate” is respect in practice: giving music space, not drowning it in dialogue, not demanding it mimic a placeholder cue because the cut has become addicted to it, not treating the score as a last-minute adhesive for narrative problems.
Subtextually, North is talking about hierarchy. Film music is collaborative on paper but subordinate in reality, and the composer is often asked to be both artist and technician: deliver emotion on command, fix pacing, disappear when it works. His irony is that the medium most reliant on music’s invisible labor is run by people who may not understand its mechanics.
It also hints at a broader cultural blind spot: cinema celebrates auteurs, while music is expected to be “support.” North’s frustration is aesthetic, but it’s also political - a reminder that taste isn’t the same as craft, and authority doesn’t guarantee listening.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Alex
Add to List


