"There are three classes of men; the retrograde, the stationary and the progressive"
About this Quote
Taxonomies are how moralists smuggle judgments into the room wearing the outfit of common sense. Lavater's neat triptych - retrograde, stationary, progressive - looks like a neutral observation about human variety. It isn't. It's a moral sorting hat that turns history into a character test: you are either moving with the times, resisting them, or failing to move at all.
As an 18th-century Swiss theologian, Lavater is writing in the long shadow of the Enlightenment, when "progress" was starting to harden into a civic religion and older Christian accounts of time (fall, redemption, eternity) were being pressured by secular narratives of development. His phrasing borrows the Enlightenment's confidence in directionality - a world that goes somewhere - while keeping a preacher's appetite for categorization. The subtext is disciplinary. "Stationary" sounds mild, even passive, but in a culture obsessed with improvement, stasis becomes a sin: not wickedness, just a failure of duty. "Retrograde" is worse: not merely wrong, but actively moving against the arc.
The intent is to produce urgency and allegiance. If the future is a moral gradient, no one wants to be caught walking downhill. Lavater's genius is how quickly the sentence recruits you. It invites the listener to self-identify as progressive while implying that everyone else is either cowardly (stationary) or corrupt (retrograde). It's also a revealing snapshot of a modern habit we still can't quit: reducing complex disagreements into a simple map of motion, where winning is defined as forward movement, and arguing about the destination is treated as a suspect delay.
As an 18th-century Swiss theologian, Lavater is writing in the long shadow of the Enlightenment, when "progress" was starting to harden into a civic religion and older Christian accounts of time (fall, redemption, eternity) were being pressured by secular narratives of development. His phrasing borrows the Enlightenment's confidence in directionality - a world that goes somewhere - while keeping a preacher's appetite for categorization. The subtext is disciplinary. "Stationary" sounds mild, even passive, but in a culture obsessed with improvement, stasis becomes a sin: not wickedness, just a failure of duty. "Retrograde" is worse: not merely wrong, but actively moving against the arc.
The intent is to produce urgency and allegiance. If the future is a moral gradient, no one wants to be caught walking downhill. Lavater's genius is how quickly the sentence recruits you. It invites the listener to self-identify as progressive while implying that everyone else is either cowardly (stationary) or corrupt (retrograde). It's also a revealing snapshot of a modern habit we still can't quit: reducing complex disagreements into a simple map of motion, where winning is defined as forward movement, and arguing about the destination is treated as a suspect delay.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Johann
Add to List










