"There are times over different projects when I've asked the writers why people are swearing for no good reason. I tell them that it would be funnier if there weren't these swear words"
About this Quote
Ratzenberger is making a case for comic discipline in an era that often mistakes “edgy” for “funny.” As a working actor who’s lived inside writers’ rooms and voice booths, he’s not moralizing about profanity; he’s talking about craft. Swearing can be a shortcut: a quick jolt of heat that signals attitude without building a joke sturdy enough to stand on its own. His instinct is that the laugh should come from character, timing, and surprise, not from the linguistic equivalent of turning the volume up.
The subtext is a quiet pushback against the post-cable, post-streaming permission slip. Once television and film loosened standards, profanity became available as a seasoning, then as a crutch. Ratzenberger’s “for no good reason” is the key phrase: he’s not anti-swearing, he’s anti-laziness. Comedy, at its best, creates tension and then releases it. If you release it too early with a cheap shock word, you flatten the rhythm. The line becomes about the swear, not about the person saying it.
There’s also a performer’s pragmatism here. A clean joke travels: it plays to broader audiences, ages better, and reveals the comic idea instead of the writer’s desire to prove they’re unfiltered. By arguing it would be “funnier” without the swear words, Ratzenberger is defending the oldest comedy flex of all: making people laugh under constraints, where the only weapon left is wit.
The subtext is a quiet pushback against the post-cable, post-streaming permission slip. Once television and film loosened standards, profanity became available as a seasoning, then as a crutch. Ratzenberger’s “for no good reason” is the key phrase: he’s not anti-swearing, he’s anti-laziness. Comedy, at its best, creates tension and then releases it. If you release it too early with a cheap shock word, you flatten the rhythm. The line becomes about the swear, not about the person saying it.
There’s also a performer’s pragmatism here. A clean joke travels: it plays to broader audiences, ages better, and reveals the comic idea instead of the writer’s desire to prove they’re unfiltered. By arguing it would be “funnier” without the swear words, Ratzenberger is defending the oldest comedy flex of all: making people laugh under constraints, where the only weapon left is wit.
Quote Details
| Topic | Funny |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List





