"There are two sayings that are familiar in every news room across the country: 1) sex sells; 2) if it bleeds it leads"
About this Quote
News isn’t just reported; it’s merchandised. Armstrong Williams’ blunt newsroom doublet - “sex sells” and “if it bleeds it leads” - strips away the pieties that journalism likes to wear in public and names the economic engine underneath. The lines work because they’re not lofty; they’re trade slang, the kind of cynical wisdom passed down like a shortcut. Two punchy aphorisms, numbered like a checklist, turn editorial judgment into routine: pick the story that triggers appetite or alarm, then watch the metrics move.
The intent is both descriptive and accusatory. Williams is telling you how editors are trained to think when attention is the scarce resource and advertising is the reward. The subtext is damning: “news value” is often a euphemism for “audience capture.” Sex and blood are not merely topics; they’re reliable buttons, a way to hack the limbic system and keep people from changing the channel or closing the tab. That’s why the phrasing is so durable: it reduces a complicated institution to two primal levers.
Context matters here. Coming from a working journalist, the quote reads less like an outsider’s conspiracy theory and more like an insider’s weary candor about incentive structures. In an era of shrinking newsrooms, 24/7 cycles, and algorithmic competition, these maxims don’t just describe tabloid excess; they describe survival strategies. The uncomfortable implication is that even “serious” outlets can drift toward sensationalism, not because everyone is corrupt, but because attention economics quietly rewrites what counts as important.
The intent is both descriptive and accusatory. Williams is telling you how editors are trained to think when attention is the scarce resource and advertising is the reward. The subtext is damning: “news value” is often a euphemism for “audience capture.” Sex and blood are not merely topics; they’re reliable buttons, a way to hack the limbic system and keep people from changing the channel or closing the tab. That’s why the phrasing is so durable: it reduces a complicated institution to two primal levers.
Context matters here. Coming from a working journalist, the quote reads less like an outsider’s conspiracy theory and more like an insider’s weary candor about incentive structures. In an era of shrinking newsrooms, 24/7 cycles, and algorithmic competition, these maxims don’t just describe tabloid excess; they describe survival strategies. The uncomfortable implication is that even “serious” outlets can drift toward sensationalism, not because everyone is corrupt, but because attention economics quietly rewrites what counts as important.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Armstrong
Add to List




