"There are two things which cannot be attacked in front: ignorance and narrow-mindedness. They can only be shaken by the simple development of the contrary qualities. They will not bear discussion"
About this Quote
Acton’s line lands like a tactical memo disguised as moral advice: stop charging the fortress. “Attacked in front” borrows the language of battle, but the enemy he names is internal and self-sealing. Ignorance and narrow-mindedness aren’t positions you defeat with better arguments; they’re conditions that metabolize argument into proof of persecution, turning debate into reinforcement. The sting is in the last sentence: “They will not bear discussion.” It’s less a lament than a diagnosis of how certain minds protect themselves by treating dialogue as an assault.
The intent is pragmatic, even a little chilly. Acton isn’t preaching patience for its own sake; he’s warning that direct confrontation flatters the very traits you’re trying to undo. The subtext: rational exchange requires shared norms - curiosity, good faith, a willingness to revise. Without those “contrary qualities,” discussion becomes theater, and the would-be educator ends up conscripted as the villain in someone else’s story.
Context matters. Acton, a liberal Catholic historian famous for distrusting concentrated power, watched 19th-century Europe grind through nationalist fervor, confessional fights, and ideological certainty dressed up as destiny. His historical sensibility shows: he’s describing not a single bad opinion but an ecosystem. Change, he implies, comes indirectly - by cultivating habits of mind, institutions, education, and examples that make ignorance uncomfortable and narrowness costly. It’s an argument for slow counter-programming over heroic dunking, and it reads eerily like a critique of today’s outrage economy, where “discussion” often functions as spectacle rather than persuasion.
The intent is pragmatic, even a little chilly. Acton isn’t preaching patience for its own sake; he’s warning that direct confrontation flatters the very traits you’re trying to undo. The subtext: rational exchange requires shared norms - curiosity, good faith, a willingness to revise. Without those “contrary qualities,” discussion becomes theater, and the would-be educator ends up conscripted as the villain in someone else’s story.
Context matters. Acton, a liberal Catholic historian famous for distrusting concentrated power, watched 19th-century Europe grind through nationalist fervor, confessional fights, and ideological certainty dressed up as destiny. His historical sensibility shows: he’s describing not a single bad opinion but an ecosystem. Change, he implies, comes indirectly - by cultivating habits of mind, institutions, education, and examples that make ignorance uncomfortable and narrowness costly. It’s an argument for slow counter-programming over heroic dunking, and it reads eerily like a critique of today’s outrage economy, where “discussion” often functions as spectacle rather than persuasion.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Lord
Add to List
