"There are very few personal problems that cannot be solved through a suitable application of high explosives"
About this Quote
A joke like this works because it’s engineered to be obviously wrong in a way that still flatters a certain kind of frustration. By dragging “personal problems” into the language of demolition, Adams is riffing on a cartoonist’s favorite trick: taking an emotion (anger, helplessness, petty grievance) and giving it the clean, mechanical simplicity of a gadget. High explosives are the fantasy of instant resolution: no messy conversation, no accountability, no slow work of changing yourself. Just force, applied “suitably,” as if relationship conflict and existential dread were merely engineering challenges.
The phrasing matters. “Very few” and “suitable application” mimic bureaucratic calm, the tone of a safety manual or procurement memo. That deadpan procedural voice is the comedy; it treats violence as a consumer product with correct usage instructions. The subtext is less “violence is good” than “isn’t it tempting to imagine a reset button,” which is why the line can land as catharsis in a culture saturated with grievance and fantasies of control.
Context-wise, Adams comes out of the late-20th-century office-satire ecosystem where cynicism is currency and exaggerated misanthropy reads as punchline rather than manifesto. Still, the gag tugs at an American thread: the suspicion that problems are best handled with overwhelming force, recast here as a private, domestic impulse. You laugh, then notice what it’s smuggling in: the idea that complexity is an insult, and that destruction counts as competence when you’re tired of negotiating.
The phrasing matters. “Very few” and “suitable application” mimic bureaucratic calm, the tone of a safety manual or procurement memo. That deadpan procedural voice is the comedy; it treats violence as a consumer product with correct usage instructions. The subtext is less “violence is good” than “isn’t it tempting to imagine a reset button,” which is why the line can land as catharsis in a culture saturated with grievance and fantasies of control.
Context-wise, Adams comes out of the late-20th-century office-satire ecosystem where cynicism is currency and exaggerated misanthropy reads as punchline rather than manifesto. Still, the gag tugs at an American thread: the suspicion that problems are best handled with overwhelming force, recast here as a private, domestic impulse. You laugh, then notice what it’s smuggling in: the idea that complexity is an insult, and that destruction counts as competence when you’re tired of negotiating.
Quote Details
| Topic | Dark Humor |
|---|
More Quotes by Scott
Add to List



