"There cannot be greater rudeness than to interrupt another in the current of his discourse"
About this Quote
The subtext is deeply political. Locke wrote in a world where authority often spoke over everyone else: courts, pulpits, patrons, parliament. Interruption is a miniature version of that power move. It asserts hierarchy (my urgency outranks your reasoning), and it turns dialogue into a contest for the floor rather than a search for truth. Locke’s liberal project depends on consent, deliberation, and the idea that a person’s mind is their own; letting someone finish a thought becomes a small act of recognizing their agency.
The line also reads like a preemptive strike against the performative heckler, the conversational bully, the man who treats debate as sport. Locke’s “rudeness” is not just bad etiquette; it’s epistemic sabotage. You can’t evaluate an argument you won’t allow to exist in full. In that sense, interruption isn’t merely impolite - it’s an attack on reason itself, carried out with the innocuous weapon of impatience.
Quote Details
| Topic | Respect |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Locke, John. (2026, January 15). There cannot be greater rudeness than to interrupt another in the current of his discourse. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-cannot-be-greater-rudeness-than-to-33289/
Chicago Style
Locke, John. "There cannot be greater rudeness than to interrupt another in the current of his discourse." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-cannot-be-greater-rudeness-than-to-33289/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"There cannot be greater rudeness than to interrupt another in the current of his discourse." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-cannot-be-greater-rudeness-than-to-33289/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.












