"There has not been a war in South America for fifty years, and I have every confidence that the countries of Central and South America are deeply in earnest in the maintenance of peace"
About this Quote
Kellogg’s confidence reads like a diplomatic lullaby sung over a map that he’d rather keep tidy than accurate. In the late 1920s, “peace” was being sold as a modern achievement: a policy outcome you could lock in with signatures, conferences, and the right kind of international etiquette. As U.S. Secretary of State and architect of the Kellogg-Briand Pact, he had professional reasons to sound certain. Optimism wasn’t just temperament; it was strategy.
The phrasing is doing careful work. “There has not been a war” frames peace as an absence of formal interstate conflict, not an absence of coercion, intervention, coups, border skirmishes, or internal violence. That narrow definition conveniently sidelines the messy reality of U.S. power in the region, where “maintaining stability” often meant shaping governments and economies to fit Washington’s preferences. The line “deeply in earnest” is the giveaway: it’s less a description than a reassurance, aimed at audiences who want Latin America imagined as a calm neighborhood under a benevolent hemisphere-wide order.
Context sharpens the subtext. Pan-American rhetoric in this era regularly doubled as a claim to U.S. stewardship, with peace functioning as both moral credential and geopolitical lubricant. Kellogg’s statement flatters the region while subtly positioning the United States as the adult in the room, the guarantor of a civilized status quo. It works because it’s not merely hopeful; it’s performative, trying to conjure a reality where treaties substitute for pressure and where “earnestness” can stand in for sovereignty.
The phrasing is doing careful work. “There has not been a war” frames peace as an absence of formal interstate conflict, not an absence of coercion, intervention, coups, border skirmishes, or internal violence. That narrow definition conveniently sidelines the messy reality of U.S. power in the region, where “maintaining stability” often meant shaping governments and economies to fit Washington’s preferences. The line “deeply in earnest” is the giveaway: it’s less a description than a reassurance, aimed at audiences who want Latin America imagined as a calm neighborhood under a benevolent hemisphere-wide order.
Context sharpens the subtext. Pan-American rhetoric in this era regularly doubled as a claim to U.S. stewardship, with peace functioning as both moral credential and geopolitical lubricant. Kellogg’s statement flatters the region while subtly positioning the United States as the adult in the room, the guarantor of a civilized status quo. It works because it’s not merely hopeful; it’s performative, trying to conjure a reality where treaties substitute for pressure and where “earnestness” can stand in for sovereignty.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Frank
Add to List

