"There is a continuum of values between the churches and the general community. What distinguishes the handling of these values in the churches is mainly the heavier dosage of religious vocabulary involved"
About this Quote
Berger is puncturing a comforting myth: that churches operate on a moral frequency the rest of society can’t tune into. By calling values a "continuum", he refuses the clean border we like to draw between sacred and secular life. The jab lands because it’s empirically plausible and mildly deflating. Churches don’t so much mint new virtues as repackage broadly shared ones - honesty, care, restraint - in a thicker syrup of religious language.
The phrase "heavier dosage" is doing the real work. It frames religious talk as an additive, not an essence: more vocabulary, more ritual framing, more metaphysical justification. The subtext is classic Berger: religion as "sacred canopy" - not pure otherworldliness, but a social technology that stabilizes meaning. If the underlying values overlap with the "general community", then what’s distinctive is the interpretive equipment: sin and redemption, covenant and calling, grace and judgment. Those terms don’t just decorate morality; they authorize it, intensify it, and police it. They can turn ordinary ethical norms into cosmic stakes.
Context matters. Berger wrote in a mid-to-late 20th century moment when sociology was challenging the idea that modernity simply erases religion. He’s also implicitly answering both sides of a culture war: the religious who claim unique moral ownership, and the secular who dismiss church ethics as alien. His point is cooler and sharper: the difference is often rhetorical and institutional, not moral DNA. That’s why it stings. It suggests churches thrive less by being morally incomparable than by narrating familiar moral life as sacred.
The phrase "heavier dosage" is doing the real work. It frames religious talk as an additive, not an essence: more vocabulary, more ritual framing, more metaphysical justification. The subtext is classic Berger: religion as "sacred canopy" - not pure otherworldliness, but a social technology that stabilizes meaning. If the underlying values overlap with the "general community", then what’s distinctive is the interpretive equipment: sin and redemption, covenant and calling, grace and judgment. Those terms don’t just decorate morality; they authorize it, intensify it, and police it. They can turn ordinary ethical norms into cosmic stakes.
Context matters. Berger wrote in a mid-to-late 20th century moment when sociology was challenging the idea that modernity simply erases religion. He’s also implicitly answering both sides of a culture war: the religious who claim unique moral ownership, and the secular who dismiss church ethics as alien. His point is cooler and sharper: the difference is often rhetorical and institutional, not moral DNA. That’s why it stings. It suggests churches thrive less by being morally incomparable than by narrating familiar moral life as sacred.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List
