"There is a higher law than the Constitution"
About this Quote
Drop this line into 1850 and it detonates. William H. Seward, a canny New York politician with an abolitionist streak, wasn’t tossing off a pious platitude; he was staking out a theory of moral sovereignty at the exact moment the nation was trying to launder slavery through legal procedure. The immediate backdrop is the Compromise of 1850 and, especially, the Fugitive Slave Act, which forced citizens and officials in free states to assist in capturing alleged escapees. “There is a higher law than the Constitution” is Seward’s refusal to let legality become a conscience substitute.
The brilliance is in the provocation. Seward turns the Constitution from an ultimate authority into a negotiable instrument, subordinate to “higher law” language that echoes natural rights, Protestant moral reasoning, and the Declaration’s more expansive promises. It’s a rhetorical jailbreak: if the Constitution can be wrong, then obedience isn’t inherently virtuous. That move reassigns moral agency back to the individual and the community, inviting resistance, not just disagreement.
The subtext is also strategic. Seward is telling Northern moderates they don’t have to pretend the Compromise is statesmanship; they can call it complicity. To Southern ears, it sounds like an open threat: if “higher law” trumps constitutional compromise, then the bonds holding the Union look conditional. The phrase compresses the coming crisis into one sentence: a republic discovering that its founding document can’t reconcile a moral atrocity, only manage it, until someone refuses management.
The brilliance is in the provocation. Seward turns the Constitution from an ultimate authority into a negotiable instrument, subordinate to “higher law” language that echoes natural rights, Protestant moral reasoning, and the Declaration’s more expansive promises. It’s a rhetorical jailbreak: if the Constitution can be wrong, then obedience isn’t inherently virtuous. That move reassigns moral agency back to the individual and the community, inviting resistance, not just disagreement.
The subtext is also strategic. Seward is telling Northern moderates they don’t have to pretend the Compromise is statesmanship; they can call it complicity. To Southern ears, it sounds like an open threat: if “higher law” trumps constitutional compromise, then the bonds holding the Union look conditional. The phrase compresses the coming crisis into one sentence: a republic discovering that its founding document can’t reconcile a moral atrocity, only manage it, until someone refuses management.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List
