"There is a very intimate connection between hypnotic phenomena and religion"
About this Quote
The line points to a shared psychology beneath trance and faith. Hypnosis concentrates attention, heightens suggestibility, and makes a person unusually responsive to cues. Many religious practices cultivate a similar narrowing and intensifying of consciousness: rhythmic chanting, repetitive prayer, incense and music, synchronized movement, and the authoritative voice of a priest, pastor, or guru. Expectation, trust, and the surrounding crowd amplify the effect. Conversion surges, speaking in tongues, possession states, and experiences of ecstasy or rapture can be read as culturally shaped trance phenomena, with suggestion and absorption organizing what the mind perceives as revelation.
Havelock Ellis, an English physician and pioneering sexologist writing in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, worked at a moment when mesmerism and hypnotism were migrating from stage curiosities into clinical and research settings. Figures like Charcot and the Nancy school were codifying hypnotic technique, while William James was analyzing religious experience with psychological tools. Victorian culture saw revivalist movements and spiritualist seances flourishing alongside new medical theories of suggestion. Ellis, who often traced moral and mystical life to bodily and psychological processes, uses this linkage to demystify without necessarily dismissing.
The connection cuts both ways. On one side, it explains why ritual can heal and console: a focused, expectant mind responds powerfully to symbols and narratives, mobilizing placebo and meaning responses that alter pain, mood, and behavior. On the other, it warns how easily authority and crowd dynamics can shape belief, memory, and perception. The same machinery can build solidarity or license fanaticism.
Important differences remain. Hypnosis is a technique bounded by consent and a specific relationship; religion is a vast symbolic world with ethics, cosmology, and community. Yet at the level of human attention and embodiment, both enlist the capacity to enter altered states, to be moved by story and rhythm, and to remake reality through shared suggestion. Recognizing that intimacy clarifies both the power and the peril of the sacred.
Havelock Ellis, an English physician and pioneering sexologist writing in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, worked at a moment when mesmerism and hypnotism were migrating from stage curiosities into clinical and research settings. Figures like Charcot and the Nancy school were codifying hypnotic technique, while William James was analyzing religious experience with psychological tools. Victorian culture saw revivalist movements and spiritualist seances flourishing alongside new medical theories of suggestion. Ellis, who often traced moral and mystical life to bodily and psychological processes, uses this linkage to demystify without necessarily dismissing.
The connection cuts both ways. On one side, it explains why ritual can heal and console: a focused, expectant mind responds powerfully to symbols and narratives, mobilizing placebo and meaning responses that alter pain, mood, and behavior. On the other, it warns how easily authority and crowd dynamics can shape belief, memory, and perception. The same machinery can build solidarity or license fanaticism.
Important differences remain. Hypnosis is a technique bounded by consent and a specific relationship; religion is a vast symbolic world with ethics, cosmology, and community. Yet at the level of human attention and embodiment, both enlist the capacity to enter altered states, to be moved by story and rhythm, and to remake reality through shared suggestion. Recognizing that intimacy clarifies both the power and the peril of the sacred.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|
More Quotes by Havelock
Add to List
