"There is an appropriate time to release somebody or to give them a break"
About this Quote
For a man who became infamous for insisting the state execute him, Gary Gilmore’s talk of “an appropriate time” to “release somebody” lands like a grim parody of mercy. The line borrows the language of discretion - parole boards, judges, administrators weighing rehabilitation against risk. Coming from a convicted murderer, it reads less like civic-minded advice and more like a forced audition for reasonableness: a bid to sound measured inside a system that had already branded him beyond measure.
What makes it work is the slipperiness of “appropriate.” Appropriate for whom? The prisoner desperate for daylight, the institution trying to look humane, the public craving safety, the officials avoiding blame? Gilmore’s phrasing hides the power question inside etiquette. “Release” and “give them a break” are soft, almost colloquial, the kind of words used to smooth over brutality. They sanitize the reality that “release” is a political decision and “a break” is often a moral wager.
In context, Gilmore’s notoriety sits at the crossroads of 1970s American punishment culture: the death penalty returning, skepticism about rehabilitation rising, the state eager to project control. His statement can be read as strategic ambiguity - flirting with the idea of leniency while embodying the argument against it. It’s the rhetoric of second chances spoken by someone who, in the public imagination, had forfeited them, which is precisely why it stings.
What makes it work is the slipperiness of “appropriate.” Appropriate for whom? The prisoner desperate for daylight, the institution trying to look humane, the public craving safety, the officials avoiding blame? Gilmore’s phrasing hides the power question inside etiquette. “Release” and “give them a break” are soft, almost colloquial, the kind of words used to smooth over brutality. They sanitize the reality that “release” is a political decision and “a break” is often a moral wager.
In context, Gilmore’s notoriety sits at the crossroads of 1970s American punishment culture: the death penalty returning, skepticism about rehabilitation rising, the state eager to project control. His statement can be read as strategic ambiguity - flirting with the idea of leniency while embodying the argument against it. It’s the rhetoric of second chances spoken by someone who, in the public imagination, had forfeited them, which is precisely why it stings.
Quote Details
| Topic | Letting Go |
|---|
More Quotes by Gary
Add to List







