"There is an immense, painful longing for a broader, more flexible, fuller, more coherent, more comprehensive account of what we human beings are, who we are and what this life is for"
About this Quote
An “immense, painful longing” is not a tasteful, brunch-friendly kind of curiosity; it’s an ache, the kind that shows up when the reigning explanations of a culture feel too thin to live inside. Bellow stacks adjectives like someone trying to out-run reduction: broader, flexible, fuller, coherent, comprehensive. The line enacts its own argument. It’s not merely asking for meaning; it’s dramatizing the frustration of being handed tidy systems - political, scientific, therapeutic, ideological - that can classify a person but can’t quite account for a life.
Bellow’s intent is double-edged. On the surface, it’s a humanist plea for a richer story of the self: not just the “how” of behavior, but the “who” of identity and the “for what” of existence. Underneath, it’s a critique of modernity’s managerial style of thinking, the habit of swapping lived complexity for categories that make institutions run smoothly. “Coherent” and “comprehensive” sound like the language of social science or philosophy; “painful longing” is the novelist’s corrective, insisting that any adequate account has to include the felt experience of wanting one.
Context matters: Bellow wrote across a century when mass society, bureaucratic rationality, and competing total explanations (from ideology to consumerism) promised clarity and delivered alienation. His fiction is crowded with brilliant talkers who can diagnose the world and still can’t bear it. This sentence belongs to that tradition: a refusal to accept that being “explained” equals being understood. It argues, slyly, for the novel itself as one of the last forms willing to hold contradictions without calling them errors.
Bellow’s intent is double-edged. On the surface, it’s a humanist plea for a richer story of the self: not just the “how” of behavior, but the “who” of identity and the “for what” of existence. Underneath, it’s a critique of modernity’s managerial style of thinking, the habit of swapping lived complexity for categories that make institutions run smoothly. “Coherent” and “comprehensive” sound like the language of social science or philosophy; “painful longing” is the novelist’s corrective, insisting that any adequate account has to include the felt experience of wanting one.
Context matters: Bellow wrote across a century when mass society, bureaucratic rationality, and competing total explanations (from ideology to consumerism) promised clarity and delivered alienation. His fiction is crowded with brilliant talkers who can diagnose the world and still can’t bear it. This sentence belongs to that tradition: a refusal to accept that being “explained” equals being understood. It argues, slyly, for the novel itself as one of the last forms willing to hold contradictions without calling them errors.
Quote Details
| Topic | Meaning of Life |
|---|
More Quotes by Saul
Add to List
