"There is but one right, and the possibilities of wrong are infinite"
About this Quote
Huxley’s line has the clipped authority of a lab note that doubles as a moral warning: truth is narrow, error is roomy. In science, “one right” doesn’t mean certainty as comfort; it means that reality is a hard constraint. A hypothesis either fits the world or it doesn’t, and there are countless ways to miss the fit - bad measurements, sloppy controls, wishful interpretation, fashionable theory, or the simple human itch to stop looking once a story feels satisfying.
The subtext is a rebuke to Victorian complacency as much as to intellectual laziness. Huxley, Darwin’s bulldog, spent his career arguing that knowledge advances less by grand proclamations than by disciplined elimination. One correct account of a phenomenon is hard-won and often provisional; the “infinite” wrongs are what you get by default when you let rhetoric outrun evidence. The phrase also smuggles in an ethic: being “nearly right” can be functionally wrong when decisions ride on precision.
What makes it work is the asymmetry. “One right” is almost austere, a single narrow path. “Infinite wrong” is expansive, dizzying, a reminder that error isn’t a rival doctrine so much as a boundless landscape of plausible nonsense. Read now, it lands as a critique of our content-saturated era: misinformation doesn’t need to be coherent to be effective, it just needs to be numerous. Huxley’s point is not that truth is rare by nature; it’s that truth is expensive, and shortcuts multiply failure.
The subtext is a rebuke to Victorian complacency as much as to intellectual laziness. Huxley, Darwin’s bulldog, spent his career arguing that knowledge advances less by grand proclamations than by disciplined elimination. One correct account of a phenomenon is hard-won and often provisional; the “infinite” wrongs are what you get by default when you let rhetoric outrun evidence. The phrase also smuggles in an ethic: being “nearly right” can be functionally wrong when decisions ride on precision.
What makes it work is the asymmetry. “One right” is almost austere, a single narrow path. “Infinite wrong” is expansive, dizzying, a reminder that error isn’t a rival doctrine so much as a boundless landscape of plausible nonsense. Read now, it lands as a critique of our content-saturated era: misinformation doesn’t need to be coherent to be effective, it just needs to be numerous. Huxley’s point is not that truth is rare by nature; it’s that truth is expensive, and shortcuts multiply failure.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Thomas
Add to List
