"There is no bird flu in commercial stocks"
About this Quote
The key word is "commercial". It implies a boundary around what counts as relevant risk: not "in birds", not "in the supply chain", not "in workers", but in the inventory that moves through regulated, saleable channels. That’s a bureaucratic definition masquerading as a common-sense one. The subtext is a familiar modern bargain: trust the system because the system is audited. The intent isn’t to map uncertainty; it’s to stop a feedback loop of panic, misinformation, and market disruption.
It also reveals how public-facing science gets contorted by the need to be legible. A more technically honest version would be conditional and time-stamped: "No evidence at present..". Mann’s bluntness trades epistemic humility for communicative force. In an era where "absence of evidence" gets misheard as "evidence of absence", the line risks becoming a screenshot-ready absolution. It’s the kind of statement designed to stabilize a moment, even if the longer story of surveillance, mutation, and lagging detection remains messier than the sentence allows.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Mann, Michael E. (2026, January 16). There is no bird flu in commercial stocks. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-bird-flu-in-commercial-stocks-95961/
Chicago Style
Mann, Michael E. "There is no bird flu in commercial stocks." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-bird-flu-in-commercial-stocks-95961/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"There is no bird flu in commercial stocks." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-bird-flu-in-commercial-stocks-95961/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2026.







