"There is no more independence in politics than there is in jail"
About this Quote
The intent is not to argue that elections are illegitimate; it's to puncture the self-flattering language politicians use about independence. The subtext is about systems: party discipline, donor pressure, patronage, newspaper influence, and the need to stay electable. Even the would-be maverick is hemmed in by incentives, colleagues, and consequences. "Jail" is doing a lot of work here because it collapses respectable constraints (committee assignments, fundraising deadlines, whip counts) into a blunt metaphor anyone can feel in their gut. It's also a warning to voters: if you want "independent" leadership, you might be asking for a structural impossibility, not a personality type.
Context matters. Rogers was writing in a period when mass media was reshaping politics, party machines still mattered, and the interwar years were thick with cynicism about institutions. His genius is to make that cynicism sound like common sense, smuggling a grim diagnosis in a one-liner that lands like a laugh and lingers like an indictment.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Rogers, Will. (2026, January 18). There is no more independence in politics than there is in jail. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-more-independence-in-politics-than-16005/
Chicago Style
Rogers, Will. "There is no more independence in politics than there is in jail." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-more-independence-in-politics-than-16005/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"There is no more independence in politics than there is in jail." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-more-independence-in-politics-than-16005/. Accessed 17 Feb. 2026.







