"There is no point in me worrying about what Bloomberg or Badillo will do"
About this Quote
The naming matters. Bloomberg and Badillo evoke two different threats. Bloomberg represents technocratic money and managerial competence packaged as inevitability; Badillo, the insurgent appeal of ethnic coalition-building and anti-establishment energy. By pairing them, Dinkins flattens the field into a single category: other people’s agendas. The subtext is: I can’t control their ambition, but I can control my message, my ground game, my governing vision. It’s also a subtle assertion of incumbency or statesmanship, depending on the moment: worry is for underlings; leaders keep their hands steady.
There’s a deeper New York realism here, too. Dinkins knew how quickly alliances shift and how often "front-runners" are media inventions. The quote works because it rejects the dopamine economy of political gossip. It sells maturity in a marketplace that rewards panic, turning restraint into a form of power: the ability to not perform anxiety on command.
Quote Details
| Topic | Letting Go |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Dinkins, David. (2026, January 16). There is no point in me worrying about what Bloomberg or Badillo will do. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-point-in-me-worrying-about-what-110958/
Chicago Style
Dinkins, David. "There is no point in me worrying about what Bloomberg or Badillo will do." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-point-in-me-worrying-about-what-110958/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"There is no point in me worrying about what Bloomberg or Badillo will do." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-point-in-me-worrying-about-what-110958/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.




