"There is no rational reason to doubt that the universe has existed indefinitely, for an infinite time. It is only myth that attempts to say how the universe came to be, either four thousand or twenty billion years ago"
About this Quote
Alfven is doing something scientists rarely do in public: calling out the metaphysical baggage smuggled into supposedly empirical stories about origins. His provocation is blunt - not that cosmology is worthless, but that the itch to name a beginning often behaves like theology in a lab coat. The line "no rational reason to doubt" flips the usual burden of proof. Instead of demanding evidence for an eternal universe, he suggests that a finite-age cosmos is the extraordinary claim, requiring extraordinary justification.
The jab at "either four thousand or twenty billion years ago" is deliberate. By placing a young-Earth timeline beside a modern cosmological one, Alfven isn't equating creationism with astrophysics; he's puncturing the shared narrative structure: a definitive Genesis moment that satisfies human craving for a clean starting pistol. He frames that craving as "myth" - not merely "false", but culturally functional, a story-form that converts ignorance into closure.
Context matters. Alfven, a Nobel-winning plasma physicist, spent his career arguing that mainstream cosmology underweighted electromagnetic and plasma processes. He was famously skeptical of Big Bang orthodoxy and of what he saw as theory-led cosmology drifting away from testable physics. So the quote doubles as disciplinary critique: when models become origin epics, dissent can be treated as heresy rather than disagreement.
Subtext: humility is being weaponized. Alfven is warning that "how it began" can become a prestige project - a grand narrative that rewards elegance over falsifiability. His target isn't wonder, it's certainty.
The jab at "either four thousand or twenty billion years ago" is deliberate. By placing a young-Earth timeline beside a modern cosmological one, Alfven isn't equating creationism with astrophysics; he's puncturing the shared narrative structure: a definitive Genesis moment that satisfies human craving for a clean starting pistol. He frames that craving as "myth" - not merely "false", but culturally functional, a story-form that converts ignorance into closure.
Context matters. Alfven, a Nobel-winning plasma physicist, spent his career arguing that mainstream cosmology underweighted electromagnetic and plasma processes. He was famously skeptical of Big Bang orthodoxy and of what he saw as theory-led cosmology drifting away from testable physics. So the quote doubles as disciplinary critique: when models become origin epics, dissent can be treated as heresy rather than disagreement.
Subtext: humility is being weaponized. Alfven is warning that "how it began" can become a prestige project - a grand narrative that rewards elegance over falsifiability. His target isn't wonder, it's certainty.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Hannes
Add to List







