"There is no real excellence in all of this world which can be separated from right living"
About this Quote
Excellence, Jordan insists, is not a trophy you can carry out of a dirty room. The line is a moral tripwire: it refuses the modern habit of treating achievement as self-justifying. Talent, productivity, prestige, even brilliance in the arts or sciences are declared incomplete if they can be detached from "right living" - a phrase that sounds quaint until you notice how aggressively it polices the boundary between accomplishment and character.
The intent is reformist, almost hygienic. Jordan is arguing against a compartmentalized life where public greatness coexists with private rot. In an era when industrial capitalism was minting tycoons and institutions were professionalizing expertise, this kind of sentence functions as a warning label: civilization can produce dazzling outputs while quietly corroding its moral core. "Real excellence" becomes a contested term; he is staking out a definition that denies neutrality. Excellence is not just skill, it is the ethical use of skill.
The subtext is also defensive. By rooting excellence in "right living", Jordan elevates the moral educator over the mere specialist. It's a bid for authority: the writer (and by extension, the public moralist) gets to judge the engineer, the financier, the politician. You can hear the Progressive-era faith that private virtue and public health are linked - that social problems are not only structural but behavioral.
Read today, the sentence cuts both ways. It can sound like needed accountability in a culture that excuses "genius" misconduct, or like a gatekeeping tool that lets the powerful define what "right" means and disqualify dissent as moral failure. That tension is precisely why it still works.
The intent is reformist, almost hygienic. Jordan is arguing against a compartmentalized life where public greatness coexists with private rot. In an era when industrial capitalism was minting tycoons and institutions were professionalizing expertise, this kind of sentence functions as a warning label: civilization can produce dazzling outputs while quietly corroding its moral core. "Real excellence" becomes a contested term; he is staking out a definition that denies neutrality. Excellence is not just skill, it is the ethical use of skill.
The subtext is also defensive. By rooting excellence in "right living", Jordan elevates the moral educator over the mere specialist. It's a bid for authority: the writer (and by extension, the public moralist) gets to judge the engineer, the financier, the politician. You can hear the Progressive-era faith that private virtue and public health are linked - that social problems are not only structural but behavioral.
Read today, the sentence cuts both ways. It can sound like needed accountability in a culture that excuses "genius" misconduct, or like a gatekeeping tool that lets the powerful define what "right" means and disqualify dissent as moral failure. That tension is precisely why it still works.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by David
Add to List









