"There is no reason against woman's elevation, but prejudices"
About this Quote
The phrasing matters. “No reason” is absolute, not conciliatory. Rose doesn’t plead for incremental reform or special accommodation. She uses “woman’s elevation” to name advancement as upward movement - moral, civic, intellectual - and then makes the only obstacle sound embarrassingly small: not law, not capability, not evidence, just the stale inheritance of bias. The subtext is a strategic reversal: if you oppose women’s rights, you’re not conservative, you’re irrational.
Context sharpens the blade. Rose, a Polish-Jewish immigrant and freethinker active in U.S. abolitionism and women’s rights, spoke in a culture that treated female subordination as both divinely sanctioned and scientifically “proven.” Her sentence anticipates modern critiques of “rationalized” discrimination: institutions can look orderly, but the engine is often fear of losing unearned power. It works because it offers no safe middle ground; you either join the project of equality or admit you’re defending prejudice.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Rose, Ernestine. (2026, January 17). There is no reason against woman's elevation, but prejudices. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-reason-against-womans-elevation-but-45167/
Chicago Style
Rose, Ernestine. "There is no reason against woman's elevation, but prejudices." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-reason-against-womans-elevation-but-45167/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"There is no reason against woman's elevation, but prejudices." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-reason-against-womans-elevation-but-45167/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.







