"There is no reason to repeat bad history"
About this Quote
The phrasing matters. "No reason" is not "no excuse". It’s colder, more forensic. It implies that the usual justifications - caution, custom, political convenience - don’t even rise to the level of rational argument. And "repeat" is key: history isn’t framed as fate or an unstoppable cycle, but as a decision someone is making, right now, with eyes open. Norton’s best rhetorical move is that she doesn’t have to name the villain. The subject of repeating is implied: lawmakers, institutions, the public. If you’re offended, you’ve volunteered yourself as the doer.
"Bad history" is also a pointed category. Not all history is "bad"; she isn’t rejecting the past, she’s sorting it. The subtext is about preventable harms that get laundered into respectability over time: disenfranchisement sold as stability, inequality defended as tradition, abuses rationalized as "how things were". In that light, the quote becomes a call for institutional memory with teeth. It asks for something rarer than regret: policy that learns.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning from Mistakes |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Norton, Eleanor Holmes. (2026, January 16). There is no reason to repeat bad history. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-reason-to-repeat-bad-history-87005/
Chicago Style
Norton, Eleanor Holmes. "There is no reason to repeat bad history." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-reason-to-repeat-bad-history-87005/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"There is no reason to repeat bad history." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-reason-to-repeat-bad-history-87005/. Accessed 18 Feb. 2026.








